‘Hell? Yes!’ Moorean reasons to reject three objections to the possibility of damnation

Objections to the orthodox doctrine of an eternal hell often rely on arguments that it cannot be a person’s own fault that she ends up in hell. The article summarizes and addresses three significant arguments which aim to show that it could not be any individual’s fault that they end up in hell. I r...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Rooney, James Dominic (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 2026
In: Religious studies
Anno: 2026, Volume: 62, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 151-163
Altre parole chiave:B Universalism
B Sin
B Responsibility
B Hell
B Predestination
Accesso online: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1963557905
003 DE-627
005 20260305150834.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260305s2026 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0034412524000787  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1963557905 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1963557905 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1042549907  |0 (DE-627)769103456  |0 (DE-576)394026683  |4 aut  |a Rooney, James Dominic 
109 |a Rooney, James Dominic  |a Rooney, Alan Christian  |a Ni Jia Daoming 
245 1 0 |a ‘Hell? Yes!’ Moorean reasons to reject three objections to the possibility of damnation 
264 1 |c 2026 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Objections to the orthodox doctrine of an eternal hell often rely on arguments that it cannot be a person’s own fault that she ends up in hell. The article summarizes and addresses three significant arguments which aim to show that it could not be any individual’s fault that they end up in hell. I respond to these objections by showing that those who affirm a classical picture of sin have Moorean reasons to reject these objections. That classical perspective holds that all (serious) sin involves choosing eternal destiny apart from God and that no sin could possibly be caused by God. Consequently, it is necessary for ending up in hell that someone commit a serious sin, and it is sufficient for ending up damned that one persists forever in sin. Since the objections conflict with Moorean commitments central to the classical perspective, those who hold to such a classical perspective on sin would have good reason to reject all these arguments, which involve assumptions that would entail that such a perspective is false. 
650 4 |a Hell 
650 4 |a Predestination 
650 4 |a Responsibility 
650 4 |a Sin 
650 4 |a Universalism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religious studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965  |g 62(2026), 1, Seite 151-163  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)265785405  |w (DE-600)1466479-3  |w (DE-576)079718671  |x 1469-901X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:62  |g year:2026  |g number:1  |g pages:151-163 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412524000787  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/hell-yes-moorean-reasons-to-reject-three-objections-to-the-possibility-of-damnation/9FC7ADA4B3D2BE3D00D1808197DAB880  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4930085675 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1963557905 
LOK |0 005 20260305150412 
LOK |0 008 260305||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 939   |a 05-03-26  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL