In defence of Rebel Angel Theodicy

Rebel Angel Theodicy - often called Satan Theodicy - is the thesis that horrendous evils are directly or indirectly caused by angels who disobeyed God. In this article, I defend it, developing Gary Emberger’s suggestion that they influenced the course of evolution. After defending speculative theodi...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Forrest, Peter 1948- (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 2026
In: Religious studies
Anno: 2026, Volume: 62, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 81-94
Altre parole chiave:B Theodicy
B Evoluzione
B Angels
B Satan
B Horrendous Evil
Accesso online: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1963557859
003 DE-627
005 20260305151228.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260305s2026 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0034412524000520  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1963557859 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1963557859 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)132753898  |0 (DE-627)690844336  |0 (DE-576)164182365  |4 aut  |a Forrest, Peter  |d 1948- 
109 |a Forrest, Peter 1948- 
245 1 0 |a In defence of Rebel Angel Theodicy 
264 1 |c 2026 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Rebel Angel Theodicy - often called Satan Theodicy - is the thesis that horrendous evils are directly or indirectly caused by angels who disobeyed God. In this article, I defend it, developing Gary Emberger’s suggestion that they influenced the course of evolution. After defending speculative theodicy, I expound Rebel Angel Theodicy and reply to seven objections that explicate the widespread judgement of implausibility:1. That the existence of angels is metaphysically problematic.2. That God has no good reason to create angels.3. That angels have no power to harm human beings.4. That God, foreknowing the possibility of rebellion, would not delegate to angels the power to guide evolution.5. That even if there was a good reason for God to delegate this power to angels it is metaphysically impossible for an omnipotent God to do so.6. That God, knowing of the angels’ rebellion, would subsequently intervene to put evolution back onto the preferred divine plan.7. That there is no plausible motive for angels to rebel. 
650 4 |a Satan 
650 4 |a Angels 
650 4 |a Evolution 
650 4 |a Horrendous Evil 
650 4 |a Theodicy 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religious studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965  |g 62(2026), 1, Seite 81-94  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)265785405  |w (DE-600)1466479-3  |w (DE-576)079718671  |x 1469-901X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:62  |g year:2026  |g number:1  |g pages:81-94 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412524000520  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/in-defence-of-rebel-angel-theodicy/40D927A33902C8FA21080FE20A97051C  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4930085624 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1963557859 
LOK |0 005 20260305150408 
LOK |0 008 260305||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 939   |a 05-03-26  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Evolution,Evolution 
STB 0 0 |a Évolution,Évolution 
STC 0 0 |a Evolución 
STD 0 0 |a Evoluzione 
STE 0 0 |a 进化,演变 
STF 0 0 |a 進化,演變 
STG 0 0 |a Evolução 
STH 0 0 |a Эволюция 
STI 0 0 |a Εξέλιξη 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Abstammung