Questione dignità

An unresolved question emerges from the numerous constitutional or international texts that contain the reference to dignity: is homo dignus man as such, in his kind, or, as the Italian Constitution affirmed, a person in his/her community? This results in two opposing conceptions of dignity: objecti...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Colaianni, Nicola 1946- (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Stampa Articolo
Lingua:Italiano
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 2024
In: Dignità umana
Anno: 2024, Pagine: 11-34
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Dignità dell'essere umano / Diritti umani <motivo> / Costituzione / Pluralismo
Notazioni IxTheo:SA Diritto ecclesiastico
SB Diritto canonico
Accesso online: lizenzpflichtig

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 196319571X
003 DE-627
005 20260306150443.0
007 tu
008 260302s2024 xx ||||| 00| ||ita c
020 |a 9788815425102 
035 |a (DE-627)196319571X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP196319571X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a ita 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1172952965  |0 (DE-627)1042033102  |0 (DE-576)514920890  |4 aut  |a Colaianni, Nicola  |d 1946- 
109 |a Colaianni, Nicola 1946- 
245 1 0 |a Questione dignità  |c Nicola Colaianni 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a An unresolved question emerges from the numerous constitutional or international texts that contain the reference to dignity: is homo dignus man as such, in his kind, or, as the Italian Constitution affirmed, a person in his/her community? This results in two opposing conceptions of dignity: objective – based on guarantees and limitations of human rights – and subjective – which is linked to the self-determination of each human person. That reflect in the field of bioethics, where it is common to distinguish two systems of thoughts: Christian bioethics and secular bioethics. In this essay the two paradigms are tested with constitutional jurisprudences related to end-of-life and medically assisted procreation. The result is a tendency to bring out the dimension of dignity as a source of some fundamental rights, such those related to as self-determination, in balance with each other rights, such as those referring the inviolability of human life. In general, the notion of dignity cannot be divorced from that of obligation. As such, an a priori notion of dignity must be tested in the light of the notion of cultural-religious pluralism. 
652 |a SA:SB 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4038654-5  |0 (DE-627)106231219  |0 (DE-576)209031360  |2 gnd  |a Menschenwürde 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4074725-6  |0 (DE-627)106088556  |0 (DE-576)209195088  |2 gnd  |a Menschenrecht 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4062787-1  |0 (DE-627)106130196  |0 (DE-576)209146095  |2 gnd  |a Verfassung 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4046401-5  |0 (DE-627)104313021  |0 (DE-576)209069473  |2 gnd  |a Pluralismus 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Dignità umana  |d Bologna : Il mulino, 2024  |g (2024), Seite 11-34  |h 255 p  |w (DE-627)1906394539  |z 9788815425102  |7 nnam 
773 1 8 |g year:2024  |g pages:11-34 
776 1 |o 10.1440/114441 
856 4 1 |u https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1440/114441  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |7 1 
935 |a DAKR 
951 |a AR 
CAN |a 1 
ELC |b 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4926211882 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 196319571X 
LOK |0 005 20260303112946 
LOK |0 008 260302||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135-3  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135-3 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135-3 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053313  |a SB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053283  |a SA 
LOK |0 939   |a 02-03-26  |b l01 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Constitution,Human dignity,Human dignity,Human rights,Human rights,Pluralism,Plurality,Pluralism 
STB 0 0 |a Constitution,Dignité humaine,Dignité humaine,Droit de l’homme,Droitsde l’homme,Droit humain,Droit humain,Droits de l'homme (droit international),Droit humain (motif),Droit humain,Pluralisme,Pluralisme (philosophie),Multipartisme 
STC 0 0 |a Constitución,Derechos Humanos,Derechos Humanos,Dignidad humana,Dignidad humana,Pluralismo 
STD 0 0 |a Costituzione,Dignità dell'essere umano,Dignità dell'essere umano,Diritti umani <motivo>,Diritti umani,Diritti dell'uomo,Diritti dell'uomo,Diritti dell'uomo (motivo),Diritti dell'uomo,Pluralismo 
STE 0 0 |a 人权,人的尊严,人的尊严,人格尊严,人性尊严,人格尊严,人性尊严,多元论,宪法 
STF 0 0 |a 人權,人的尊嚴,人的尊嚴,人格尊嚴,人性尊嚴,人格尊嚴,人性尊嚴,多元論,憲法 
STG 0 0 |a Constituição,Dignidade humana,Dignidade humana,Direitos Humanos,Direitos Humanos,Pluralismo 
STH 0 0 |a Конституция,Плюрализм,Права человека (мотив),Права человека,Человеческое достоинство (мотив),Человеческое достоинство 
STI 0 0 |a Ανθρώπινα δικαιώματα <μοτίβο>,Ανθρώπινα δικαιώματα,Δικαιώματα του ανθρώπου,Δικαιώματα του ανθρώπου (μοτίβο),Ανθρώπινη αξιοπρέπεια <μοτίβο>,Ανθρώπινη αξιοπρέπεια,Αξιοπρέπεια του ανθρώπου,Αξιοπρέπεια του ανθρώπου (μοτίβο),Πλουραλισμός,Σύνταγμα 
SUB |a CAN 
SYG 0 0 |a Menschenrechte,Menschenrechte , Constitution,Constitutionalism,Grundgesetz,Staatliche Verfassung,Staatsverfassung,Verfassungstheorie,Staatsverfassung,Verfassungen , Pluralität