Re-Examining the Statistical Methodology and Onomastic Claims of Gregor and Blais' Argument from Name Popularity

In 2024 Gregor and Blais published a JSNT article using two different statistical methods to conclude, contra Bauckham (2017), that selected Apocryphal texts and the Babylonian Talmuds do not correspond to the distribution among first-century Palestinian Jews statistically significantly worse than t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Wilson, Jason (Author) ; van de Weghe, Luuk (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2026
In: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Year: 2026, Volume: 48, Issue: 3, Pages: 760-781
Further subjects:B Authenticity
B Gregor and Blais
B Onomastics
B goodness-of-fit
B Gospels and Acts
B Richard Bauckham
B Statistics
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1963002210
003 DE-627
005 20260226113215.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260226s2026 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/0142064X251377023  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1963002210 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1963002210 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Wilson, Jason  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0009-0003-7734-1110  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Re-Examining the Statistical Methodology and Onomastic Claims of Gregor and Blais' Argument from Name Popularity 
264 1 |c 2026 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In 2024 Gregor and Blais published a JSNT article using two different statistical methods to conclude, contra Bauckham (2017), that selected Apocryphal texts and the Babylonian Talmuds do not correspond to the distribution among first-century Palestinian Jews statistically significantly worse than the distribution in Gospels-Acts "and " the two corpora paradoxically align better in some respects? In this paper, we show that the first method is statistically invalid, and the second is the wrong tool for the job. This is in alignment with the critique of Van de Weghe and Wilson (2024) and in support of their use of the chi-squared goodness-of-fit test which established name occurrences in the Gospels and Acts, as opposed to Gregor and Blais's uniform, apocryphal, or Talmudic corpora, "fit into their historical context at least as well as those in the works of Josephus" (p. 184). Regarding this historical context, helpful insights are provided by Gregor and Blais regarding potential distortions within the onomastic reference distribution, and this article suggests a way forward, addressing orthographic issues, sample biases, several problems with the implementation of Gregor and Blais' inclusion criteria, and 87 new onomastic finds from ossuaries, ostraca, and documentary papyri that need to be incorporated into the lexicon. While Gregor and Blais raise legitimate concerns, several problems with their own onomastic datasets are also discussed. 
601 |a Statistik 
601 |a Methodologie 
601 |a Argumentation 
601 |a Popularen 
650 4 |a Authenticity 
650 4 |a Gospels and Acts 
650 4 |a Gregor and Blais 
650 4 |a Richard Bauckham 
650 4 |a goodness-of-fit 
650 4 |a Onomastics 
650 4 |a Statistics 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1377229122  |0 (DE-627)1936567385  |4 aut  |a van de Weghe, Luuk 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal for the study of the New Testament  |d London : Sage, 1978  |g 48(2026), 3, Seite 760-781  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341347906  |w (DE-600)2067510-0  |w (DE-576)099025957  |x 1745-5294  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:48  |g year:2026  |g number:3  |g pages:760-781 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X251377023  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4922909877 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1963002210 
LOK |0 005 20260226110621 
LOK |0 008 260226||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 939   |a 26-02-26  |b l01 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw