El principio energía
The author states that the conception of energy such as it has arrived to our time, has its origin in Ancient Greece, but the contemporary notion of energy includes many difficulties to be accepted without any criticism . In fact, physicists and philosophers disagree with its acope in the natural wo...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado: |
2008
|
| En: |
Sapientia
Año: 2008, Volumen: 63, Número: 223, Páginas: 220-238 |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Acto
B Teoria De La Relatividad B Fisica B Filosofia B Einstein, Albert, 1879-1955 B Energia |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Sumario: | The author states that the conception of energy such as it has arrived to our time, has its origin in Ancient Greece, but the contemporary notion of energy includes many difficulties to be accepted without any criticism . In fact, physicists and philosophers disagree with its acope in the natural world, and, furthermore, with its entitative nature . Several opinion of psysico-mathematicians and philosophers are discussed in this article . However, in the final conclusion it is declared the need of a return to the aristotelian-thomistic theory which identifies energy with the act of being, now o f every wordly thing, now of separate substances, because God's proper act, which is his own essence, is nothing different from the energy conceived as the pure act of both Aristotle's and Aquinas ' metaphysics . El autor declara que la concepción de la energía, tal como ha arribado a nuestro tiempo, tiene sus orígenes en la Antigua Grecia , pero la noción contemporánea de energía incluye muchas dificultades como para ser aceptada sin crítica . De hecho, los físicos y filósofos discrepan con sus alcances en el mundo natural, y, además, con su naturaleza entitativa. En este artículo se discuten las opiniones de varios fisicomatemáticos y filósofos. No obstante, e n la conclusión final se expresa la necesidad de retornar a la teoría aristotélico-tomista que identifica la energía con el acto de ser, ya de cada cosa mundana, ya de las substancias separadas, porque el acto propio de Dios, que es su misma esencia, no es nada diferente de la energía concebida como el acto puro de la metafísica de Aristóteles y de Santo Tomás de Aquino. |
|---|---|
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Sapientia
|
