Implementing clinical ethics support services in psychiatry: A qualitative study

Background Despite the ubiquity of ethical challenges in psychiatric practice, many psychiatric hospitals in Germany have not yet successfully established clinical ethics support services (CESS).Aim Offering and evaluating a program that supports professionals in implementing CESS in psychiatric hos...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Braun, Esther 1995- (Author) ; Faissner, Mirjam (Author) ; Hempeler, Christin (Author) ; Markwort, Susanne (Author) ; Müller, Tanja (Author) ; Pollmächer, Thomas (Author) ; Radenbach, Katrin (Author) ; Roth, Fee (Author) ; Schomburg, Anna-Karina (Author) ; Simon, Alfred 1966- (Author) ; Gather, Jakov 1983- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2026
In: Nursing ethics
Year: 2026, Volume: 33, Issue: 1, Pages: 101-117
Further subjects:B ethics committees
B Mental Health Care
B Moral Case Deliberation
B Ethics Consultation
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1961233851
003 DE-627
005 20260218063136.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260217s2026 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/09697330251366595  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1961233851 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1961233851 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1236248295  |0 (DE-627)1761491709  |4 aut  |a Braun, Esther  |d 1995- 
109 |a Braun, Esther 1995-  |a Braun, Esther Marysia Margarethe 1995- 
245 1 0 |a Implementing clinical ethics support services in psychiatry: A qualitative study 
264 1 |c 2026 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Background Despite the ubiquity of ethical challenges in psychiatric practice, many psychiatric hospitals in Germany have not yet successfully established clinical ethics support services (CESS).Aim Offering and evaluating a program that supports professionals in implementing CESS in psychiatric hospitals in Germany, and identifying which barriers and facilitators they encounter in the process.Research design, participants and research context We offered online implementation support to four psychiatric hospitals over a period of 14 months, which included regular support meetings with members of the hospitals? ethics committees. We conducted three focus groups with a total of 12 members of the respective clinical ethics committees at the beginning of the project, after 6 and after 12 months. Focus group transcripts and protocols of the support meetings were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.Ethical considerations The study was approved by the University?s Research Ethics Committee.Results Barriers for implementation included structural factors, such as a lack of financial and time resources, a lack of knowledge about ethics consultation and its benefits in psychiatry, and difficulties distinguishing ethical questions from medical and legal questions or team conflicts. Participants assumed that specific psychiatric expertise was necessary to offer ethics consultation for psychiatric cases but generally found interdisciplinary and multiprofessional ethics committees helpful. Further helpful factors included the support of hospital management and strategies to increase awareness for ethics support services among different professional groups. Participants found the online support program helpful to discuss specific problems and identify next steps for implementation, and reported improvements in the implementation of CESS in the respective hospitals.Conclusions The provision of adequate personnel and time resources is essential to address structural implementation barriers. Our study demonstrates that establishing support programs on a broader scale is promising to improve the implementation of CESS in psychiatry. 
601 |a Implementation 
601 |a Psychiatrie 
650 4 |a ethics committees 
650 4 |a Ethics Consultation 
650 4 |a Mental Health Care 
650 4 |a Moral Case Deliberation 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1272830144  |0 (DE-627)1822531837  |4 aut  |a Faissner, Mirjam 
700 1 |a Hempeler, Christin  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Markwort, Susanne  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Müller, Tanja  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Pollmächer, Thomas  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Radenbach, Katrin  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Roth, Fee  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Schomburg, Anna-Karina  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)122029054  |0 (DE-627)081692307  |0 (DE-576)293056536  |4 aut  |a Simon, Alfred  |d 1966- 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1019547413  |0 (DE-627)690941269  |0 (DE-576)358300754  |4 aut  |a Gather, Jakov  |d 1983- 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Nursing ethics  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1994  |g 33(2026), 1, Seite 101-117  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)324869460  |w (DE-600)2031461-9  |w (DE-576)273866605  |x 1477-0989  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2026  |g number:1  |g pages:101-117 
856 |u https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/09697330251366595  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251366595  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 491864502X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1961233851 
LOK |0 005 20260217093823 
LOK |0 008 260217||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 939   |a 17-02-26  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw