Non-Tracing Cases: Tracing their Mistake

When is ignorance culpable? One plausible suggestion is that culpable ignorance is always a form of derivative responsibility. One is culpable on accounts like this, only when one’s ignorance can be traced back to some past bit of behavior for which the agent was directly (non-derivatively) responsi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Biebel, Nathan (Verfasst von)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: 2025
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Jahr: 2025, Band: 22, Heft: 5/6, Seiten: 531-555
weitere Schlagwörter:B Negligence
B Culpable ignorance
B Moral Responsibility
B Epistemic Condition
Online-Zugang: Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1961160137
003 DE-627
005 20260216131215.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260216s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/17455243-20254206  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1961160137 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1961160137 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Biebel, Nathan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Non-Tracing Cases: Tracing their Mistake 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a When is ignorance culpable? One plausible suggestion is that culpable ignorance is always a form of derivative responsibility. One is culpable on accounts like this, only when one’s ignorance can be traced back to some past bit of behavior for which the agent was directly (non-derivatively) responsible, and which led to unwitting wrongdoing. One of the main arguments against these so-called tracing accounts claims that our practices include many cases wherein we judge an ignorant agent blameworthy even though there is nothing to which we can plausibly trace her culpability. This article defends tracing accounts from these alleged non-tracing cases. I argue that, when we adequately highlight or fill in the details of each case then either no tracing explanation is needed because it is a case of direct, non-derivative responsibility, there is a tracing explanation after all, or we don’t judge the agent blameworthy. 
650 4 |a Epistemic Condition 
650 4 |a Culpable ignorance 
650 4 |a Moral Responsibility 
650 4 |a Negligence 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 22(2025), 5/6, Seite 531-555  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:22  |g year:2025  |g number:5/6  |g pages:531-555 
856 |u http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/bitstreams/bf19a64e-70a3-4e5b-b53c-34e646974e23/download  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/22/05-06/article-p531_001.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20254206  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4918260624 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1961160137 
LOK |0 005 20260216130102 
LOK |0 008 260216||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 939   |a 16-02-26  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw