Science, Religion, and Rationality: A Neo-Hegelian Approach

The paper argues that identifying rational action with action undertaken for a reason yields Popper's well-known identification of rationality with criticism. However, it is also shown, pace Popper, to yield a strong form of normative framework dependency of the kind critical rationalists notor...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fish, Menaḥem 1948- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2013
In: Toronto journal of theology
Year: 2013, Volume: 29, Issue: 2, Pages: 319-336
Further subjects:B confrontational religiosity
B Rationality
B Self-criticism
B framework transitions
B framework-dependency
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1961157683
003 DE-627
005 20260216124440.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260216s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3138/tjt.1942  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1961157683 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1961157683 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1068405252  |0 (DE-627)820228613  |0 (DE-576)167657348  |4 aut  |a Fish, Menaḥem  |d 1948- 
109 |a Fish, Menaḥem 1948-  |a Fisch, Menachem 1948-  |a Fîš, Menaḥēm 1948- 
245 1 0 |a Science, Religion, and Rationality: A Neo-Hegelian Approach 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The paper argues that identifying rational action with action undertaken for a reason yields Popper's well-known identification of rationality with criticism. However, it is also shown, pace Popper, to yield a strong form of normative framework dependency of the kind critical rationalists notoriously reject. But deeming rationality to be framework dependent, it argues further, raises the particularly exasperating problem of the very possibility of rational framework replacement. If the normative framework to which one is committed is presupposed in critical reasoning, how can one ever have normative reason to replace it? The first part of the paper briefly discusses the problem and some of the attempts to solve it, while arguing for an alternative approach. The second part, explores some of the consequences of adopting such an approach first for the historiography of scientific framework transitions, and finally for the theology of inter and intra-religious dialogue, with special reference to what might be termed the confrontational theology of the rabbinic literature of late antiquity. 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a confrontational religiosity 
650 4 |a framework transitions 
650 4 |a framework-dependency 
650 4 |a Rationality 
650 4 |a Self-criticism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Toronto journal of theology  |d Toronto, Ontario : School, 2004  |g 29(2013), 2, Seite 319-336  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)618790020  |w (DE-600)2537907-0  |w (DE-576)398101299  |x 1918-6371  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:29  |g year:2013  |g number:2  |g pages:319-336 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1642782440  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3138/tjt.1942  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://utppublishing.com/doi/10.3138/tjt.1942  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 491825649X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1961157683 
LOK |0 005 20260216123734 
LOK |0 008 260216||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a ixrk 
LOK |0 939   |a 16-02-26  |b l01 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw