A Naturalistic Explanation of Miracles: The Case of Ibn Sīnā

In this article I focus on Ibn Sīnā's explanation of miracles and argue that he accepts the occurrence of miracles as extraordinary events, despite his theory of the necessity of everything. His explanation of miracles may be considered naturalistic, since it does not require an exceptional div...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Acar, Rahim 1966- (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado em: 2017
Em: Toronto journal of theology
Ano: 2017, Volume: 33, Páginas: 161-173
Outras palavras-chave:B conception of God
B Miracles
B al-Ghazālī
B naturalistic explanation
B Ibn Sīnā
Acesso em linha: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 196092155X
003 DE-627
005 20260212142426.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260212s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3138/tjt.33.suppl_1.161  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)196092155X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP196092155X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1367532558  |0 (DE-627)1927270332  |4 aut  |a Acar, Rahim  |d 1966- 
109 |a Acar, Rahim 1966- 
245 1 2 |a A Naturalistic Explanation of Miracles: The Case of Ibn Sīnā 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this article I focus on Ibn Sīnā's explanation of miracles and argue that he accepts the occurrence of miracles as extraordinary events, despite his theory of the necessity of everything. His explanation of miracles may be considered naturalistic, since it does not require an exceptional divine intervention. First, I analyze Ibn Sīnā's theory of miracles, then I relate it to his explanation of the functioning of the universe. I try to answer how it might be possible to accept both the necessary causal nexus within the world and the occurrence of miracles as violations of the natural laws. Finally, I take into account al-Ghazālī's critique of "philosophers," including Ibn Sīnā, on their acceptance of a necessary connection between causes and effects, a critique supposedly aimed at saving the possibility and actual occurrence of miracles. I try to make sense of al-Ghazālī's text, vis-à-vis the fact that Ibn Sīnā did not deny the occurrence of miracles, and the fact that his theory provides a possible explanation thereof. Hence, I argue that the real issue between al-Ghazālī and the philosophers he attacked regarding the purportedly necessary connection between causes and effects is not the possibility of miracles, but the proper conception of God. 
650 4 |a Ibn Sīnā 
650 4 |a al-Ghazālī 
650 4 |a conception of God 
650 4 |a Miracles 
650 4 |a naturalistic explanation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Toronto journal of theology  |d Toronto, Ontario : School, 2004  |g 33(2017), Supplement 1, Seite 161-173  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)618790020  |w (DE-600)2537907-0  |w (DE-576)398101299  |x 1918-6371  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2017  |g supplement:Supplement 1  |g pages:161-173 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3138/tjt.33.suppl_1.161  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://utppublishing.com/doi/10.3138/tjt.33.suppl_1.161  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4914086514 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 196092155X 
LOK |0 005 20260212142320 
LOK |0 008 260212||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a ixrk 
LOK |0 939   |a 12-02-26  |b l01 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw