Hayden White: Meaning and Truth in History

Hayden White’s proposal that the meaning of historical writing is determined by the figure of speech (“trope”) which the historian applies to the data of research challenges a naive understanding of historical writing concerned merely with the presentation of past facts . To answer the charge that t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hammond, David M. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 1994
In: Philosophy & theology
Year: 1994, Volume: 8, Issue: 4, Pages: 291-307
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1960814117
003 DE-627
005 20260212055513.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260212s1994 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/philtheol1994848  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1960814117 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1960814117 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hammond, David M.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Hammond, David M. 
245 1 0 |a Hayden White: Meaning and Truth in History 
264 1 |c 1994 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Hayden White’s proposal that the meaning of historical writing is determined by the figure of speech (“trope”) which the historian applies to the data of research challenges a naive understanding of historical writing concerned merely with the presentation of past facts . To answer the charge that the poetic imposition of meaning does not allow for truthful representation of the Holocaust, White appeals to the knowable facts of the past which are then structured according to a figure of speech. He thus hopes to secure the element of ideology critique while maintaining that facts are arranged according ta the historian’s decision and not according to the historian’s understanding of what was, in Lonergan’s language, “going forward” in the past. This essay argues that, although meaning is not already present in the events of the past, neither is it simply imposed on these events by the historian’s trope. Lonergan’s more adequate construal of historical writing recognizes the dynamism of inquiry which rejects a naive view of facts, yet also argues for the possibility of truthful, albeit always partial, representations of events. 
601 |a Historie 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Philosophy & theology  |d Charlottesville, Va. : Philosophy Documentation Center, 1986  |g 8(1994), 4, Seite 291-307  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)372365930  |w (DE-600)2122985-5  |w (DE-576)443081883  |x 2153-828X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:1994  |g number:4  |g pages:291-307 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)163584150X  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/philtheol1994848  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=philtheol&id=philtheol_1994_0008_0004_0291_0307  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4913553712 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1960814117 
LOK |0 005 20260212055513 
LOK |0 008 260212||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2026-02-09#B4C589B2DAF77BD51D0B26848990C2F0C3DC5308 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixrk  |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 12-02-26  |b l01 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL