The Moral Argument For The Non-Existence Of God

I highlight a dimension of the debate about the problem of evil and the existence of God that has loomed on the periphery and consider how, if at all, a specific consideration of that dimension can move the debate forward. My contention is that there is specific version of moral argument for the non...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Krettek, Thomas (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 1997
Dans: Philosophy & theology
Année: 1997, Volume: 10, Numéro: 2, Pages: 329-352
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Édition parallèle:Non-électronique

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1960813587
003 DE-627
005 20260212055512.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260212s1997 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/philtheol199710225  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1960813587 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1960813587 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Krettek, Thomas  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Moral Argument For The Non-Existence Of God 
264 1 |c 1997 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a I highlight a dimension of the debate about the problem of evil and the existence of God that has loomed on the periphery and consider how, if at all, a specific consideration of that dimension can move the debate forward. My contention is that there is specific version of moral argument for the non-existence of God that is implicit in the problem of evil. This argument is a strategic but suppressed premise that strengthens or undermines the persuasiveness of arguments for or against the existence of God. This argument needs to be thematized if the debate between theism and atheism is to move forward. 
601 |a Argumentation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Philosophy & theology  |d Charlottesville, Va. : Philosophy Documentation Center, 1986  |g 10(1997), 2, Seite 329-352  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)372365930  |w (DE-600)2122985-5  |w (DE-576)443081883  |x 2153-828X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:10  |g year:1997  |g number:2  |g pages:329-352 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1643862332  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/philtheol199710225  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=philtheol&id=philtheol_1997_0010_0002_0329_0352  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4913553186 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1960813587 
LOK |0 005 20260212055512 
LOK |0 008 260212||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2026-02-09#8B93EF86007A004FB21127BDF9A8B20E0B2102F3 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixrk  |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 12-02-26  |b l01 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw