Karl Rahner's Theological Project: A Response to R. R. Reno
This article responds to the article by R. R. Reno that appeared in the May 2013 issue of the journal First Things. In that article, Reno calls Rahner a restorationist, an integralist, and the “ultimate establishment theologian,” who reassured but failed to challenge the mind-set of the Church befor...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2014
|
| In: |
Philosophy & theology
Year: 2014, Volume: 26, Issue: 2, Pages: 345-364 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1960810405 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20260213054807.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 260212s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/philtheol201492516 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1960810405 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1960810405 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1037851293 |0 (DE-627)756350093 |0 (DE-576)391887726 |4 aut |a Shields, Richard | |
| 109 | |a Shields, Richard | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Karl Rahner's Theological Project: A Response to R. R. Reno |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article responds to the article by R. R. Reno that appeared in the May 2013 issue of the journal First Things. In that article, Reno calls Rahner a restorationist, an integralist, and the “ultimate establishment theologian,” who reassured but failed to challenge the mind-set of the Church before Vatican II. Reno also claims that Rahner had a negative impact on the Church, blaming him for the many deficiencies Reno sees in contextual, feminist, liberation, and revisionist moral theology. The first part of this current article looks at the term intégrisme, and rebuts Reno’s suggestion that Rahner is an integralist. The second section explores Reno’s charge that “Rahner’s time has passed.” The third part examines the ecclesiologies of Reno and Rahner, highlighting the differences between the two and the implications for theology. The article concludes with a brief discussion of Rahner’s contribution to theology in his own right. | ||
| 601 | |a Rahner, Karl | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Philosophy & theology |d Charlottesville, Va. : Philosophy Documentation Center, 1986 |g 26(2014), 2, Seite 345-364 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)372365930 |w (DE-600)2122985-5 |w (DE-576)443081883 |x 2153-828X |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2014 |g number:2 |g pages:345-364 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1642701688 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/philtheol201492516 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=philtheol&id=philtheol_2014_0026_0002_0345_0364 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4913549995 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1960810405 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20260212055509 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 260212||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2026-02-09#6FB69377234C11E75B08D6F2FCEA3B243812A3A8 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixrk |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 12-02-26 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
