Has Wittgenstein Been Misunderstood by Wittgensteinian Philosophers of Religion?
The appropriate application of Wittgenstein's thought to problems in the philosophy of religion has long been debated. A body of emerging scholarship argues that the philosophers of religion who pioneered this application are guilty of having misunderstood and distorted Wittgenstein's thou...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2003
|
| In: |
Philosophical investigations
Jahr: 2003, Band: 26, Heft: 1, Seiten: 44-72 |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1960444352 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20260302095706.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 260210s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/1467-9205.00185 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1960444352 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1960444352 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)133199886 |0 (DE-627)538272260 |0 (DE-576)299689093 |4 aut |a Amesbury, Richard |d 1972- | |
| 109 | |a Amesbury, Richard 1972- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Has Wittgenstein Been Misunderstood by Wittgensteinian Philosophers of Religion? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2003 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The appropriate application of Wittgenstein's thought to problems in the philosophy of religion has long been debated. A body of emerging scholarship argues that the philosophers of religion who pioneered this application are guilty of having misunderstood and distorted Wittgenstein's thought. This paper seeks to counter these charges by arguing that they generally depend on either construals of Wittgenstein's thought that are themselves implausible or misreadings of the philosophers against whom they are levied. Special attention is given to accusations of fideism, quietism, expressivism, and positivism, as well as to the work of Phillips, Winch, and Rhees. | ||
| 601 | |a Philosophie | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Philosophical investigations |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1978 |g 26(2003), 1, Seite 44-72 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)32041664X |w (DE-600)2002027-2 |w (DE-576)090881567 |x 1467-9205 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2003 |g number:1 |g pages:44-72 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9205.00185 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9205.00185 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4912206989 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1960444352 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20260302095706 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 260210||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-08-25#E6A1F809571B28B84CEC2A9ED8440D9A7064E4FD | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixrk |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 10-02-26 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||
