Augustine's Criteria for Nonliteral Interpretation: A Reconsideration

The aim of this article is to demonstrate that Augustine’s criteria for nonliteral interpretation are intended partly to safeguard Scripture’s literal referent and therefore also to offer a critique of earlier allegorical exegesis. First, I discuss Augustine’s absurdity criterion (and its concomitan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Milad, Corine (Verfasst von)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: 2025
In: Augustiniana
Jahr: 2025, Band: 75, Heft: 2, Seiten: 203-223
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1960291394
003 DE-627
005 20260208054906.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260207s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2143/AUG.75.2.3294938  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1960291394 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1960291394 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Milad, Corine  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Augustine's Criteria for Nonliteral Interpretation: A Reconsideration 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The aim of this article is to demonstrate that Augustine’s criteria for nonliteral interpretation are intended partly to safeguard Scripture’s literal referent and therefore also to offer a critique of earlier allegorical exegesis. First, I discuss Augustine’s absurdity criterion (and its concomitant, charity criterion): if a text is absurd according to the letter (ad litteram), the reader must interpret figuratively (figurate). Indeed, a textual absurdity (often) indicates a rhetorical trope; accordingly, the reader should interpret tropes not literally but figuratively. Second, I show that for Augustine, the inverse also holds true: the reader must interpret ad litteram those texts that are written properly (proprie dictum). In other words, Augustine used the absurdity criterion precisely to preserve Scripture’s literal, historical referent. I argue that in doing so, Augustine both distinguished himself from and implicitly critiqued the earlier tradition of allegorical interpretation. He cautions against taking passages that refer to literal referents as though they referred to nonliteral referents; and he warns against taking individual metaphors as entire allegorical narratives. I conclude by providing examples in which Augustine and Origen provide opposite interpretations of the very same biblical passages – Augustine preserving the text’s literal referent and Origen negating the text’s literal referent. Thus, Augustine’s interpretations offer a corrective to Origen’s earlier allegorical interpretations. 
601 |a Augustiner 
601 |a Interpretation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Augustiniana  |d Leuven : Peeters, 1951  |g 75(2025), 2, Seite 203-223  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)786668970  |w (DE-600)2771166-3  |w (DE-576)407317074  |x 2295-6093  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:75  |g year:2025  |g number:2  |g pages:203-223 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2143/AUG.75.2.3294938  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?url=article&id=3294938  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4911070242 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1960291394 
LOK |0 005 20260207164605 
LOK |0 008 260207||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2026-02-06#6822D2EC00FF688DADC26E9E324DF79F0405652D 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota  |a tiep 
LOK |0 939   |a 07-02-26  |b l01 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw