The Use and Abuse of Theodicy
The present essay distinguishes two ways to "settle" the problem of evil, "defense" and "theodicy," as practiced in contemporary Christian philosophical theology. It argues that Christian theology can defend Christian belief from the charge of inconsistency, but that wh...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
1984
|
| In: |
Horizons
Year: 1984, Volume: 11, Issue: 2, Pages: 304-319 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1950968804 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20260203100458.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 260203s1984 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0360966900033715 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1950968804 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1950968804 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)133641651 |0 (DE-627)691673403 |0 (DE-576)165727659 |4 aut |a Tilley, Terrence W. |d 1947- | |
| 109 | |a Tilley, Terrence W. 1947- |a Tilley, Terrence William 1947- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Use and Abuse of Theodicy |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1984 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The present essay distinguishes two ways to "settle" the problem of evil, "defense" and "theodicy," as practiced in contemporary Christian philosophical theology. It argues that Christian theology can defend Christian belief from the charge of inconsistency, but that when it attempts to explain why and how God permits or wills evil in his world, it stumbles over denying the reality of evil or the goodness of God. The essay concludes by arguing that the Christian theologian cannot and should not attempt to make Christianity plausible by constructing theodicies but should concentrate on other methods of demonstrating the plausibility of Christianity. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Horizons |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1974 |g 11(1984), 2, Seite 304-319 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)618791159 |w (DE-600)2538094-1 |w (DE-576)31881420X |x 2050-8557 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:1984 |g number:2 |g pages:304-319 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1640805362 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0360966900033715 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/horizons/article/use-and-abuse-of-theodicy/E2F935042B27AAFA3BF3011AF4FD37E8 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4874503489 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1950968804 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20260203095158 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 260203||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a ixrk | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 03-02-26 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
