The Prudence of Religious Commitment

This essay adopts Penelhum's analysis of parity arguments to show that Christian theistic faith and atheistic secular humanism are on an epistemic par with each other. It argues that Swinburne's attempt to show that theism is more probable than atheism fails because his ultimate canon of r...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tilley, Terrence W. 1947- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 1989
In: Horizons
Year: 1989, Volume: 16, Issue: 1, Pages: 45-64
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1950790886
003 DE-627
005 20260202090126.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260202s1989 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0360966900039888  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1950790886 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1950790886 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)133641651  |0 (DE-627)691673403  |0 (DE-576)165727659  |4 aut  |a Tilley, Terrence W.  |d 1947- 
109 |a Tilley, Terrence W. 1947-  |a Tilley, Terrence William 1947- 
245 1 4 |a The Prudence of Religious Commitment 
264 1 |c 1989 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This essay adopts Penelhum's analysis of parity arguments to show that Christian theistic faith and atheistic secular humanism are on an epistemic par with each other. It argues that Swinburne's attempt to show that theism is more probable than atheism fails because his ultimate canon of rationality is essentially contested and cannot render theism more probable than atheism. It proposes a way out of the epistemic stalemate by evaluating the prudence of religious commitment. It adapts some of Mavrodes' recent arguments and Swinburne's levels of rationality to analyze the dimensions of prudence. It finally extends this "prudential calculus" to indicate how a theologian could show a religious commitment prudent, and argues that if religious authorities silence theologians, the authorities may also show that commitment to and in their tradition cannot be comprehensively prudent. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Horizons  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1974  |g 16(1989), 1, Seite 45-64  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)618791159  |w (DE-600)2538094-1  |w (DE-576)31881420X  |x 2050-8557  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:16  |g year:1989  |g number:1  |g pages:45-64 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1639969519  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0360966900039888  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/horizons/article/prudence-of-religious-commitment/D75BA37AB62228BDA3244C8272950820  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4872105044 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1950790886 
LOK |0 005 20260202082642 
LOK |0 008 260202||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a ixrk 
LOK |0 939   |a 02-02-26  |b l01 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw