Kierkegaard’s Hidden Anthropology: Humanity’s Telos in the Teleological Suspension of the Ethical

This paper presents a specific interpretation of the teleological suspension of the ethical. It argues that the suspension presupposes a theocentric anthropology in which humanity’s telos finds fulfilment in relationship with God. In performing the suspension, the individual fulfils their telos. The...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Oganessian, Armen (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 2026
In: Heythrop journal
Anno: 2026, Volume: 67, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 53-64
Accesso online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1950638545
003 DE-627
005 20260131054805.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260130s2026 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/heyj.70018  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1950638545 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1950638545 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Oganessian, Armen  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0009-0003-5211-9054  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Kierkegaard’s Hidden Anthropology: Humanity’s Telos in the Teleological Suspension of the Ethical 
264 1 |c 2026 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper presents a specific interpretation of the teleological suspension of the ethical. It argues that the suspension presupposes a theocentric anthropology in which humanity’s telos finds fulfilment in relationship with God. In performing the suspension, the individual fulfils their telos. The argument develops by situating the suspension within Kierkegaard’s broader authorship. Either/Or, Repetition, and Fear and Trembling are analysed as interconnected works that trace Stages on Life’s Way’s existential trajectory, where one moves from the aesthetic to the ethical and finally to the religious stage. Each transition occurs through a negation of the self and resulting despair. The aesthetic life fails because it grounds identity in externality, thereby undermining authenticity. The ethical life fails because it detaches duty from the person, once again denying authenticity. Initiated by the teleological suspension, the religious stage occurs when the self relates directly to God, achieving authenticity. To achieve authenticity, however, the religious stage must presuppose a theocentric anthropology in which one’s telos finds fulfilment in relation to God. It does so because only within such an anthropology does an individual gain authenticity and avoid the despair of the earlier stages by performing the suspension. 
601 |a Anthropologie 
601 |a Teleologie 
601 |a Suspension 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Heythrop journal  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960  |g 67(2026), 1, Seite 53-64  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320573052  |w (DE-600)2016721-0  |w (DE-576)094425485  |x 1468-2265  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:67  |g year:2026  |g number:1  |g pages:53-64 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.70018  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/heyj.70018  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4865427791 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1950638545 
LOK |0 005 20260130055504 
LOK |0 008 260130||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2026-01-29#85024016EA5879FB7B5DA0A56A05A9A689B26EC3 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 30-01-26  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw