The “Step Back” as a Step Forward: An Objection to Onto-Theology
This essay is an interpretation of Martin Heidegger’s notion of the ‘step back’ (Schritt zurück) in his 1957 lecture, ‘The Onto-Theo-Logical Constitution of Metaphysics’ (OCM). I argue that Heidegger’s methodology of the ‘step back’ in OCM is a disclosure (αλήθεια) opposed to a concealment (Ληθη) of...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Pubblicazione: |
2026
|
| In: |
Heythrop journal
Anno: 2026, Volume: 67, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 3-16 |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1950638391 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20260131054804.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 260130s2026 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/heyj.70013 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1950638391 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1950638391 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Golden, Timothy J. |e VerfasserIn |0 (orcid)0009-0003-7221-5748 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Golden, Timothy J. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The “Step Back” as a Step Forward: An Objection to Onto-Theology |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2026 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This essay is an interpretation of Martin Heidegger’s notion of the ‘step back’ (Schritt zurück) in his 1957 lecture, ‘The Onto-Theo-Logical Constitution of Metaphysics’ (OCM). I argue that Heidegger’s methodology of the ‘step back’ in OCM is a disclosure (αλήθεια) opposed to a concealment (Ληθη) of philosophical thinking that enables a three-fold seeing: (1) seeing how the matter of Western philosophy has always been a search for the grounding of beings in a Supreme Being; (2) seeing that the criterion for interrogating the history of philosophy is entering the force of earlier thinking through what has not been thought; and (3) seeing the essential nature of metaphysics that shows what has not been thought—the conflation of ontology with theology. It is this conflation of ontology with theology that transforms the Judeo-Christian God into the ‘god of philosophy’ before whom no one can ‘play music and dance’. Beyond Heidegger, the ‘god of philosophy’ is reflected in the theory of natural slavery in the political theology of the antebellum American south. Heidegger’s ‘step back’, then, which exposes such a false ‘god’ of oppression, opens the way for theological, political, and moral reform, and is thus a ‘step forward’. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Heythrop journal |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960 |g 67(2026), 1, Seite 3-16 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320573052 |w (DE-600)2016721-0 |w (DE-576)094425485 |x 1468-2265 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:67 |g year:2026 |g number:1 |g pages:3-16 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.70013 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/heyj.70013 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4865427643 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1950638391 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20260130055504 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 260130||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2026-01-29#A1F4F5BB3C7F7357B2F09030F29928D03E44909C | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 30-01-26 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
