Philo of Alexandria on the Difference between Philosophers and Sophists

“It is no small or easy task to define clearly the nature of a sophist” (Plato, Soph. 217b). Indeed, the definition of a sophist in antiquity appears to change and differ depending on the author and with regard to the topic. This paper investigates the different ways that Philo depicts sophists and...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:  
Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Άλλοι τίτλοι:SPECIAL SECTION: PHILO’S DE CHERUBIM
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Adams, Sean A. 1981- (Συγγραφέας)
Τύπος μέσου: Εκτύπωση Άρθρο
Γλώσσα:Αγγλικά
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Έκδοση: 2023
Στο/Στη: The studia Philonica annual
Έτος: 2023, Τόμος: 35, Σελίδες: 211-228

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a2200000 c 4500
001 1950010481
003 DE-627
005 20260122134119.0
007 tu
008 260122s2023 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1950010481 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1950010481 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1031927581  |0 (DE-627)737565519  |0 (DE-576)379633256  |4 aut  |a Adams, Sean A.  |d 1981- 
109 |a Adams, Sean A. 1981-  |a Adams, Sean 1981-  |a Adams, S. A. 1981-  |a Adams, S. 1981- 
245 1 0 |a Philo of Alexandria on the Difference between Philosophers and Sophists  |c Sean A. Adams 
246 1 |i Titelzusatz  |a SPECIAL SECTION: PHILO’S DE CHERUBIM 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a “It is no small or easy task to define clearly the nature of a sophist” (Plato, Soph. 217b). Indeed, the definition of a sophist in antiquity appears to change and differ depending on the author and with regard to the topic. This paper investigates the different ways that Philo depicts sophists and sophistry in his writings with particular attention to how he contrasts this group with philosophers and wisdom. I begin by providing a close reading of Cher. 3–10, looking to understand Philo’s arguments through connections to his wider corpus. The second half of the paper outlines the comparison... 
601 |a Alexandria 
601 |a Philosophie 
601 |a Sophistik 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The studia Philonica annual  |d Providence, RI : Brown Univ., 1989  |g 35(2023), Seite 211-228  |w (DE-627)170154262  |w (DE-600)1018015-1  |w (DE-576)020017219  |x 1052-4533  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:35  |g year:2023  |g pages:211-228 
935 |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |b 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4857738422 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1950010481 
LOK |0 005 20260122134119 
LOK |0 008 260122||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135-1  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135-1 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135-1 
LOK |0 852 1  |m p  |9 00 
LOK |0 852 2  |b FTH Z4-784  |9 00 
LOK |0 8564   |u https://bibsearch.uibk.ac.at/AC00366565 
LOK |0 935   |a inzs 
LOK |0 938   |k p 
LOK |0 939   |a 22-01-26  |b l01 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB