Subjectivity and Śūnyatā: A Conceptual Bridge between Kierkegaard and Tsongkhapa
This paper explores the possibilities for a cross-cultural and inter-religious dialogue between Søren Kierkegaard and Tsongkhapa by examining whether Kierkegaard's concept of "truth is subjectivity" parallels Tsongkhapa's notion of "truth is śūnyatā (emptiness)." Althou...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2026
|
| In: |
Buddhist Christian studies
Year: 2026, Volume: 45, Pages: 41-57 |
| Further subjects: | B
Tsongkhapa
B Śūnyatā B Kierkegaard B Comparative Philosophy B Subjectivity B Conceptual Metaphor Theory |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1949732657 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20260120122147.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 260120s2026 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1353/bcs.2026.a979818 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1949732657 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1949732657 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Yi, Jizhang |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Subjectivity and Śūnyatā |b A Conceptual Bridge between Kierkegaard and Tsongkhapa |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2026 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper explores the possibilities for a cross-cultural and inter-religious dialogue between Søren Kierkegaard and Tsongkhapa by examining whether Kierkegaard's concept of "truth is subjectivity" parallels Tsongkhapa's notion of "truth is śūnyatā (emptiness)." Although separated by time and cultural context, both thinkers challenge prevailing traditions and reimagine truth as a transformative, experiential process. Kierkegaard critiques intellectual elitism and classical foundationalism, emphasizing subjective engagement and personal commitment to existential truth. Tsongkhapa underscores the importance of philosophical reasoning and meditative practice in realizing the nonduality of conventional and ultimate truths. This paper argues that despite their distinct metaphysical assumptions, both view truth as dynamic and deeply connected to lived experience. In addition to a philosophical analysis of these parallels, the paper employs Conceptual Metaphor Theory to demonstrate how Kierkegaard's "truth is subjectivity" and Tsongkhapa's "truth is śūnyatā" reflect shared insights into the transformative and practical realization of truth. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Conceptual Metaphor Theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Kierkegaard | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Tsongkhapa | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparative Philosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Subjectivity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Śūnyatā | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Buddhist Christian studies |d Honolulu, Hawaii : Univ. of Hawaii Press, 1981 |g 45(2026), Seite 41-57 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320470148 |w (DE-600)2008426-2 |w (DE-576)117648264 |x 1527-9472 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:45 |g year:2026 |g pages:41-57 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1353/bcs.2026.a979818 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/5/article/979818 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4855131237 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1949732657 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20260120115010 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 260120||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 20-01-26 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||
