The Anger Paradox: How Angry Should Physicians Be?

This article starts from the question: how angry should physicians be? Since the literature so far has mostly focused on patient anger, we endeavor to turn bioethical attention to physician anger instead. After specifying our central question in four different ways—in terms of its normativity, its u...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallaert, Sigrid (Autor) ; Segers, Seppe (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado: 2026
En: Bioethics
Año: 2026, Volumen: 40, Número: 2, Páginas: 168-174
Otras palabras clave:B problem patients
B aptness
B Care
B physician anger
B anger paradox
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1948691396
003 DE-627
005 20260115054822.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260114s2026 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.70029  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1948691396 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1948691396 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Wallaert, Sigrid  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0002-3187-3109  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Anger Paradox: How Angry Should Physicians Be? 
264 1 |c 2026 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article starts from the question: how angry should physicians be? Since the literature so far has mostly focused on patient anger, we endeavor to turn bioethical attention to physician anger instead. After specifying our central question in four different ways—in terms of its normativity, its use of the term “physicians,” the implied patient-directed nature of this anger, and the difference between feeling and behaving angrily—we posit the anger paradox (AP) to help guide our argument. We discuss whether anger might damage the therapeutic relationship, or whether it could be a necessary expression of care. We follow three steps in looking at whether physicians can feel, should feel, or should express anger. We complicate the question of care and its objects by introducing Frankfurt's distinction between first- and second-order desires. Finally, we look at the distinction between apt and appropriate anger, concluding that while physician anger can sometimes be apt, it is never appropriate to express toward patients. 
650 4 |a problem patients 
650 4 |a physician anger 
650 4 |a Care 
650 4 |a aptness 
650 4 |a anger paradox 
700 1 |a Segers, Seppe  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0001-8231-6487  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 40(2026), 2, Seite 168-174  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:40  |g year:2026  |g number:2  |g pages:168-174 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70029  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.70029  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4847277791 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1948691396 
LOK |0 005 20260114055504 
LOK |0 008 260114||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2026-01-13#80ACD587BDD1510348BBE46F031C4AF6228A7C79 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 14-01-26  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Care 
STB 0 0 |a Care,Sollicitude,Sollicitude 
STC 0 0 |a Care,Cuidado,Cuidado 
STD 0 0 |a Care 
STG 0 0 |a Care,Cuidado,Cuidado 
STH 0 0 |a Этика заботы 
STI 0 0 |a Care (ηθική)