Complaint of Nullity due to Denail of Right of Defense in Second Instance and Suspension of Execution of a Confirmatory Decree: Canons 1620, 7°, 1621 and 1627
An affirmative decision given in first instance was ratified by the court of second instance. When the respondent received notification of the ratification, she complained that she had not received notification of the publication of the sentence given in first instance and therefore had no opportuni...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Druck Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
1996
|
| In: |
Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions 1996
Jahr: 1996, Seiten: 120-122 |
| IxTheo Notationen: | SB Katholisches Kirchenrecht |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Katholische Kirche Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1627
B Verfahrensfehler B Rechtsschutz B Katholische Kirche Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1621 B Katholische Kirche Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1620, §7 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1947904914 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20260112122349.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 260107s1996 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 020 | |a 0943616751 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1947904914 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1947904914 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-627)1235144895 |0 (DE-576)165144890 |4 aut |a Punderson, Joseph R. | |
| 109 | |a Punderson, Joseph R. |a Punderson, Joseph Robert | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Complaint of Nullity due to Denail of Right of Defense in Second Instance and Suspension of Execution of a Confirmatory Decree |b Canons 1620, 7°, 1621 and 1627 |c Joseph R. Punderson, J.C.D. |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1996 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a An affirmative decision given in first instance was ratified by the court of second instance. When the respondent received notification of the ratification, she complained that she had not received notification of the publication of the sentence given in first instance and therefore had no opportunity to read the sentence before it was confirmed in second instance. The respondent insists that the sentence given in first instance be returned to the court of second instance for reconsideration. It turns out that, because of a material error on the part of the court of first instance, notification of the publication of the sentence had been sent to the respondent at the wrong address and using her maiden name. How shall the court of second instance proceed? | ||
| 601 | |a Suspension | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)1126592889 |0 (DE-627)881149489 |0 (DE-576)484583069 |a Katholische Kirche |t Codex iuris canonici |f 1983 |p can. 1620, §7 |2 gnd |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)1213462223 |0 (DE-627)1722597623 |0 (DE-576)191644501 |a Katholische Kirche |t Codex iuris canonici |f 1983 |p can. 1621 |2 gnd |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)1213462355 |0 (DE-627)1722610018 |0 (DE-576)191644501 |a Katholische Kirche |t Codex iuris canonici |f 1983 |p can. 1627 |2 gnd |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4048835-4 |0 (DE-627)106189387 |0 (DE-576)209079444 |a Rechtsschutz |2 gnd |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4062776-7 |0 (DE-627)106130218 |0 (DE-576)209146079 |a Verfahrensfehler |2 gnd |
| 652 | |a SB | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions 1996 |d 1996 |g (1996), Seite 120-122 |h VII, 126 S. |w (DE-627)1137944536 |w (DE-576)067944531 |z 0943616751 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:1996 |g pages:120-122 |
| 935 | |a DAKR | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| CAL | |a 216200799_216200799,216210000_216219999,216270000_216279999 | ||
| CAN | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |b 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4840861765 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1947904914 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20260107143044 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 260107||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135-3 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135-3 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135-3 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053313 |a SB | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 07-01-26 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Legal protection,Procedural error |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Protection juridique,Vice de procédure |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Protección jurídica |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Tutela giuridica |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 法律保护,法律保障 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 法律保護,法律保障 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Proteção jurídica |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Правовая защита |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Νομική προστασία |
| SUB | |a CAN | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Gerichtsschutz , Verfahrensverstoß |
