A Disabled Lord? Continuity and Legibility in the Resurrection

Within the diverse field of Christian disability theology, a particular reading of the resurrected body of Jesus Christ as a disabled body—one which continues to bear the ongoing wounds of the crucifixion even in its glorified state—can be observed. Such a position, often supported by both exegetica...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Clark-Howard, Andrew (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2026
In: Journal of disability & religion
Year: 2026, Volume: 30, Issue: 1, Pages: 22-33
Further subjects:B Queer Theology
B Resurrection
B disability theology
B Linn Tonstad
B Hope
B Eschatology
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1947857185
003 DE-627
005 20260108054820.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260107s2026 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/23312521.2025.2495004  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1947857185 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1947857185 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1297892151  |0 (DE-627)1854075101  |4 aut  |a Clark-Howard, Andrew 
109 |a Clark-Howard, Andrew  |a Howard, Andrew Clark- 
245 1 2 |a A Disabled Lord? Continuity and Legibility in the Resurrection 
264 1 |c 2026 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Within the diverse field of Christian disability theology, a particular reading of the resurrected body of Jesus Christ as a disabled body—one which continues to bear the ongoing wounds of the crucifixion even in its glorified state—can be observed. Such a position, often supported by both exegetical interpretations of witnesses to the resurrected Jesus, is undergirded by assumptions about both the continuity and legibility of resurrected, eschatological life. Such readings of a “disabled Lord” are thus employed to promote a fuller understanding of the dignity and personhood of people with disabilities. This paper draws on the queer theology of Linn Tonstad to argue that such assumptions are misplaced. The danger with such approaches to disability and the resurrection is that they repeat logics of continuity and legibility which entrench rather than disrupt continuums of dis/ability and personhood. Drawing off antisocial and nonnormative forms of queer theologizing employed by Tonstad and others, this article instead seeks to attend to the inherent instability and fragility of Christian hopes for the future. I therefore argue that disability theology can be better served by nonlinear, noncontinuous accounts of Christian resurrection. 
601 |a Resurrection 
650 4 |a Resurrection 
650 4 |a Queer Theology 
650 4 |a Linn Tonstad 
650 4 |a Hope 
650 4 |a Eschatology 
650 4 |a disability theology 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of disability & religion  |d Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 2014  |g 30(2026), 1, Seite 22-33  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)790615509  |w (DE-600)2777009-6  |w (DE-576)40970038X  |x 2331-253X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:30  |g year:2026  |g number:1  |g pages:22-33 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2025.2495004  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4840538468 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1947857185 
LOK |0 005 20260107055504 
LOK |0 008 260107||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2026-01-06#8239605F53AB296DFDC3A1AD0999316A739FAB41 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 07-01-26  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL