Can Atheists Play Along? Wittgensteinian Challenges to Religious Fictionalism

All atheists think that the central claims of religion are false, but not all atheists think that religion is useless. Some believe that, despite its falsehood, religious language and rituals are pragmatically valuable because they lead to goods worth getting. However, it is not easy for an atheist...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Ellis, David (Author) ; Bagheri Noaparast, Zoheir (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2025
In: Studia theologica
Year: 2025, Volume: 79, Issue: 2, Pages: 95-106
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 194747734X
003 DE-627
005 20251222055504.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251222s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/0039338X.2025.2573246  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)194747734X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP194747734X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Ellis, David  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0002-8311-0541  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Can Atheists Play Along? Wittgensteinian Challenges to Religious Fictionalism 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a All atheists think that the central claims of religion are false, but not all atheists think that religion is useless. Some believe that, despite its falsehood, religious language and rituals are pragmatically valuable because they lead to goods worth getting. However, it is not easy for an atheist to engage in religion to obtain these goods because they can feel intellectually or morally insincere in saying and doing things they consider false or faulty. Religious fictionalism aims to address this by claiming that atheists can take part as they would in a fictional game of make-believe, and as they do so knowingly, they do so sincerely. We examine religious fictionalism from a Wittgensteinian perspective, which holds religious language as not in the business of asserting factual beliefs and religious rituals as not methods for achieving things. This leads to two challenges that indicate prima facie incompatibility between Wittgenstein and religious fictionalism: religious fictionalists are usually presented as atheists who think religious beliefs are false and are motivated to participate in religion because they believe it remains useful. We conclude with some responses to each challenge, showing that hermeneutic fictionalism is the most promising form of fictionalism from a Wittgensteinian view. 
601 |a Challenger 
700 1 |a Bagheri Noaparast, Zoheir  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0001-5632-2699  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Studia theologica  |d London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1947  |g 79(2025), 2, Seite 95-106  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320453855  |w (DE-600)2006388-X  |w (DE-576)090889746  |x 1502-7791  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:79  |g year:2025  |g number:2  |g pages:95-106 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/0039338X.2025.2573246  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4832271504 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 194747734X 
LOK |0 005 20251222055504 
LOK |0 008 251222||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-12-21#6E46CA324F37F506C4CFB459256F6A4EDDB8AEAA 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 22-12-25  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw