Strijdom, J. c. 2. J. (2014). The material turn in Religious Studies and the possibility of critique: Assessing Chidester"s analysis of "the fetish". HTS teologiese studies, 70(1), . doi:10.4102/hts.v70i1.2116
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationStrijdom, Johan ca. 21. Jh. "The Material Turn in Religious Studies and the Possibility of Critique: Assessing Chidester"s Analysis of "the Fetish"." HTS Teologiese Studies 70, no. 1 (2014), https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v70i1.2116.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationStrijdom, Johan ca. 21. Jh. "The Material Turn in Religious Studies and the Possibility of Critique: Assessing Chidester"s Analysis of "the Fetish"." HTS Teologiese Studies, vol. 70, no. 1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v70i1.2116.
Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.