"Cut in two", Part 2: Reconsidering the redaction of Q 12:42−46

In his influential 1987 monograph, Kloppenborg identified three layers in the Sayings Gospel Q: the ‘formative stratum’ (or Q¹), the ‘main redaction’ (or Q²), and the ‘final recension’ (or Q³). He ascribed the cluster of sayings in Q 12:39–59 to the main redaction. Within this cluster appears the pa...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Howes, Llewellyn 1980- (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 2015
In: HTS teologiese studies
Anno: 2015, Volume: 71, Fascicolo: 1
Altre parole chiave:B Kloppenborg
B Sayings Gospel Q
B Parable
B Stratigraphy
B Main Redaction
B Stratification
B Formative Stratum
B Faithful Slave
Accesso online: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:In his influential 1987 monograph, Kloppenborg identified three layers in the Sayings Gospel Q: the ‘formative stratum’ (or Q¹), the ‘main redaction’ (or Q²), and the ‘final recension’ (or Q³). He ascribed the cluster of sayings in Q 12:39–59 to the main redaction. Within this cluster appears the parable of the loyal and wise slave (Q 12:42–46). In my view, some portions of this parable actually originate with the formative stratum. The aim of the current article is to reconsider the redactional make-up of this parable by appealing to Kloppenborg’s own criteria for distinguishing between Q1 and Q2, including those of ‘characteristic forms’, ‘characteristic motifs’ and ‘implied audience’.
ISSN:2072-8050
Comprende:Enthalten in: HTS teologiese studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.4102/hts.v71i1.2938