Radical reconciliation: The TRC should have allowed Zacchaeus to testify?
This article seeks to point out that, the inclusion of a theological term – that is ‘reconciliation’ (at the request of F.W. de Klerk on behalf of the National Party) to what was supposed to be the ‘Truth Commission’ (Boesak & DeYoung 2012; Stevens Franchi & Swart 2006) – was for the purpose...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2016
|
| In: |
HTS teologiese studies
Year: 2016, Volume: 72, Issue: 1 |
| Further subjects: | B
Apartheid
B National Party B Trc B Negotiated Settlement B Reconciliation B Democracy B Domestication B Impunity B Elite Compromise B African National Congress B Soviet Union B Capitalism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
