Non-philosophy and Derrida

This study brings the thoughts of Derrida into conversation with François Laruelle’s non-philosophy or non-standard philosophy. Laruelle argued that Derrida is a philosopher of difference, thereby grouping Derrida together with Heidegger and Deleuze as philosophers of difference. The argument of thi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Meylahn, Johann-Albrecht (Verfasst von)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: 2019
In: HTS teologiese studies
Jahr: 2019, Band: 75, Heft: 4
weitere Schlagwörter:B Laruelle
B Derrida
B Non-Philosophy
B Hermeneutics
B Philosophy
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1946158925
003 DE-627
005 20251216101536.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251216s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.4102/hts.v75i4.5665  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1946158925 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1946158925 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1034290002  |0 (DE-627)745187161  |0 (DE-576)381916766  |4 aut  |a Meylahn, Johann-Albrecht 
109 |a Meylahn, Johann-Albrecht  |a Meylahn, Johann  |a Meylahn, Johann A. 
245 1 0 |a Non-philosophy and Derrida 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This study brings the thoughts of Derrida into conversation with François Laruelle’s non-philosophy or non-standard philosophy. Laruelle argued that Derrida is a philosopher of difference, thereby grouping Derrida together with Heidegger and Deleuze as philosophers of difference. The argument of this article is to explore Derrida’s work, bringing it into conversation with Laruelle’s non-philosophy and non-standard philosophy. This article is focussed specifically on Derrida’s democracy to come in line with Laruelle’s democracy of thought. The context of this discussion is the end of philosophy or the closure of philosophy, and the opening of this closure for a democracy is yet to come – or whether the ideas of the end of philosophy or the closure of philosophy (metaphysics) are philosophical materials for Laruelle’s science of philosophy or non-philosophy. Laruelle does not seek a democracy to come, but understands these different thoughts as democracy of thought: all thoughts equal and unifacially turned not towards a democracy to come, but a future. 
650 4 |a Philosophy 
650 4 |a Non-Philosophy 
650 4 |a Hermeneutics 
650 4 |a Laruelle 
650 4 |a Derrida 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t HTS teologiese studies  |d Tygervalley : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2001  |g 75(2019), 4, Artikel-ID a5665  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)387423893  |w (DE-600)2144496-1  |w (DE-576)31297406X  |x 2072-8050  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:75  |g year:2019  |g number:4  |g elocationid:a5665 
856 |u https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/download/5665/13749  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v75i4.5665  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
856 4 0 |u https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/5665  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4828846328 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1946158925 
LOK |0 005 20251216055752 
LOK |0 008 251216||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-12-09#E90EE82AEE24DB72EF711BC6F634EAFA4A84E88C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixrk  |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 16-12-25  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw