Animism: Comparing Durkheim and Chidester"s analyses of EB Tylor"s theory of religion
The purpose of this research study was to compare the analyses of the anthropologist Edward Tylor’s animist theory of religion in the work of two major scholars of religion. At the beginning of the 20th century, Durkheim refuted Tylor’s classical explanation of the origin of religion, before he woul...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Pubblicazione: |
2021
|
| In: |
HTS teologiese studies
Anno: 2021, Volume: 77, Fascicolo: 2 |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Theories of Religion
B Comparison B Animism B Chidester B EB Tylor B Durkheim |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1946155152 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20251216101211.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 251216s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.4102/hts.v77i2.6717 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1946155152 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1946155152 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)117078321X |0 (DE-627)1040062490 |0 (DE-576)420619968 |4 aut |a Strijdom, Johan |d ca. 21. Jh. | |
| 109 | |a Strijdom, Johan ca. 21. Jh. |a Strijdom, Johan M. ca. 21. Jh. |a Strijdom, Johannes Matthys ca. 21. Jh. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Animism: Comparing Durkheim and Chidester"s analyses of EB Tylor"s theory of religion |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The purpose of this research study was to compare the analyses of the anthropologist Edward Tylor’s animist theory of religion in the work of two major scholars of religion. At the beginning of the 20th century, Durkheim refuted Tylor’s classical explanation of the origin of religion, before he would proceed to develop his own sociological explanation. At the turn of the 21st century, from a postcolonial South African location, David Chidester offered a critical analysis of the triple mediation under colonial and imperial conditions that made Tylor’s evolutionary theory possible. By foregrounding definitions, making arguments explicit and comparing these two assessments, the two analyses shed light on each other as well as allowed us to view the issue of animism in a new light. This article concluded by highlighting points that emerged and need continuing attention in the academic study of religion.Contribution: This article, as part of a collection on re-readings of major theorists of religion, offers a comparison of Durkheim and Chidester’s analyses of Tylor’s classical animist theory of religion. By comparison, the analyses shed light on each other and on the theory of animism itself, highlighting critical issues that deserve the continuing focus of students of religion. | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Chidester | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Durkheim | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EB Tylor | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparison | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Animism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theories of Religion | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t HTS teologiese studies |d Tygervalley : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2001 |g 77(2021), 2, Artikel-ID a6717 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)387423893 |w (DE-600)2144496-1 |w (DE-576)31297406X |x 2072-8050 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:77 |g year:2021 |g number:2 |g elocationid:a6717 |
| 856 | |u https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/download/6717/18787 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [deprecated] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i2.6717 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |7 0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/6717 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |7 0 |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4828840745 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1946155152 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20251216055745 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 251216||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-12-09#A8C5137A39CD2F3BA44FC0ED95B52F51DD5F1DA9 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixrk |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 16-12-25 |b l01 | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REF | |a Religionstheorie | ||
