Two ancient theologians" interpretations of the withered fig tree (Mt 21:18–22)

This article is an investigation on how two theologians from the Early Church interpreted the withered fig tree, as narrated by the evangelist Matthew (Mt 21:18–22). The two theologians referred to are Origen of Alexandria, who belongs to the pre-Nicene era and represents the Alexandrian School, and...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stander, Hennie F. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2021
In: HTS teologiese studies
Year: 2021, Volume: 77, Issue: 4
Further subjects:B Withered Fig Tree
B Origen of Alexandria
B Early Church
B Pre-Nicene Era
B School of Antioch
B Matthew 21:18–22
B Chrysostom
B Post-Nicene Era
B Alexandrian School
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1946152498
003 DE-627
005 20251216055740.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251216s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.4102/hts.v77i4.6511  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1946152498 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1946152498 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Stander, Hennie F.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Two ancient theologians" interpretations of the withered fig tree (Mt 21:18–22) 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article is an investigation on how two theologians from the Early Church interpreted the withered fig tree, as narrated by the evangelist Matthew (Mt 21:18–22). The two theologians referred to are Origen of Alexandria, who belongs to the pre-Nicene era and represents the Alexandrian School, and Ps.-Chrysostom who belongs to the post-Nicene era, and represents the School of Antioch. Origen believed that when the fig tree withered, it referred to Israel’s withering. This interpretation of the narrative surrounding the withered fig tree was very common in the Early Church. Ps.-Chrysostom makes it very clear that he cannot agree with this interpretation, which was quite common in the Early Church. He stated that it is wrong to liken the fig tree to the synagogue of the Jews. He argues that Jesus could not curse the synagogue, because he said that ‘The Son of Man did not come to destroy, but to seek and save the lost’ (cf. Lk 9:56). Moreover, if the synagogue withered, fruitful branches such as Paul, Stephen, Aquila and Priscilla could not have sprouted from the roots. These names are proof that God did not entirely reject the Jewish people. Ps.-Chrysostom then offers a different explanation to the question why the fig tree withered: He points out that Adam used the leaves of a fig tree to cover his nakedness. When Jesus caused the fig tree to wither, he wanted to show that he can give Adam a new garment of water and spirit that glistens like snow. Christ gave back to Adam what the serpent had robbed him of, namely ‘the angel-like life, the luxuriance of paradise, the garment of incorruptibility’ (PC. cp. 4).Contribution: The primary goal of this article is to explore the exegetical practices of two ancient theologians who came from two different schools and from two different eras. This study shows how they interpreted the account of the withered fig tree (Mt 21:18–22), based on their respective theological perspectives. 
601 |a Interpretation 
650 4 |a Early Church 
650 4 |a Withered Fig Tree 
650 4 |a Chrysostom 
650 4 |a School of Antioch 
650 4 |a Alexandrian School 
650 4 |a Post-Nicene Era 
650 4 |a Pre-Nicene Era 
650 4 |a Origen of Alexandria 
650 4 |a Matthew 21:18–22 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t HTS teologiese studies  |d Tygervalley : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2001  |g 77(2021), 4, Artikel-ID a6511  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)387423893  |w (DE-600)2144496-1  |w (DE-576)31297406X  |x 2072-8050  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:77  |g year:2021  |g number:4  |g elocationid:a6511 
856 |u https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/download/6511/18364  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.6511  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
856 4 0 |u https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/6511  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4828835318 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1946152498 
LOK |0 005 20251216055740 
LOK |0 008 251216||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-12-09#6D70E0701883B9311F4B7E0EEBCA664AEB9FC5C0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixrk  |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 16-12-25  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw