On the moral (in)equivalence of human embryos and stem cell-derived embryo models

Gyngell et al argue that no intrinsic differences exist between stem cell-derived embryo models (SCEMs) and embryos derived from fertilisation that would justify attributing a higher moral status to the latter. Consequently, they claim there is no ethical rationale for treating SCEMs differently fro...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:On the moral equivalence of human embryos and stem cell-derived embryo models
On the moral inequivalence of human embryos and stem cell-derived embryo models
Authors: Graeff, Nienke de (Author) ; Proost, Lien de (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2025
In: Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2025, Volume: 51, Issue: 12, Pages: 853-855
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1942118104
003 DE-627
005 20251124110351.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251124s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/jme-2025-110866  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1942118104 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1942118104 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Graeff, Nienke de  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0002-0045-4366  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a On the moral (in)equivalence of human embryos and stem cell-derived embryo models 
246 3 3 |a On the moral equivalence of human embryos and stem cell-derived embryo models 
246 3 3 |a On the moral inequivalence of human embryos and stem cell-derived embryo models 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Gyngell et al argue that no intrinsic differences exist between stem cell-derived embryo models (SCEMs) and embryos derived from fertilisation that would justify attributing a higher moral status to the latter. Consequently, they claim there is no ethical rationale for treating SCEMs differently from embryos and contend that endorsing SCEMs as having moral advantages over embryos constitutes an obfuscation. In this commentary, we challenge the assertion that human SCEMs and embryos are morally equivalent by painting a more nuanced picture of the moral value of (different kinds of) SCEMs and embryos. First, we highlight the diversity among SCEMs, noting that different types of SCEMs need not be morally equivalent. This point is illustrated by taking a closer look at their potentiality, a property often considered relevant to moral status. Second, we observe that Gyngell et al, like much of the broader debate, primarily concentrate on the direct moral status of SCEMs in their analysis of the moral (in)equivalence with embryos. We argue that a comprehensive moral evaluation should encompass different types of moral value, evaluating not only direct moral status but also relational, symbolic and instrumental value. Ultimately, we suggest that the real obfuscation lies not in endorsing SCEMs as having moral advantages over embryos but rather in the overemphasis on direct moral status and the binary thinking about the moral (in)equivalence of embryos versus SCEMs that dominates these discussions. 
700 1 |a Proost, Lien de  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 51(2025), 12, Seite 853-855  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:51  |g year:2025  |g number:12  |g pages:853-855 
856 |u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7617984  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2025-110866  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/51/12/853  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 481187160X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1942118104 
LOK |0 005 20251124102803 
LOK |0 008 251124||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw