Priority for registered organ donors: unfair discrimination against non-donors?

Priority rules give priority to registered organ donors in the allocation of organs. Such rules might directly discriminate against non-donors or indirectly discriminate against those whose religious commitments prevent them from registering. However, while priority rules may qualify as discriminato...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Albertsen, Andreas (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2025
In: Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2025, Volume: 51, Issue: 12, Pages: 827-831
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 194211804X
003 DE-627
005 20251124111558.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251124s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/jme-2024-110029  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)194211804X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP194211804X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Albertsen, Andreas  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0001-7528-2493  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Priority for registered organ donors  |b unfair discrimination against non-donors? 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Priority rules give priority to registered organ donors in the allocation of organs. Such rules might directly discriminate against non-donors or indirectly discriminate against those whose religious commitments prevent them from registering. However, while priority rules may qualify as discriminatory, they are not necessarily wrong for the reasons discrimination is usually thought to be wrong - for reasons related to harm and disrespect. While they can be so for reasons related to problematic mental states and demeaningness, they need not be. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 51(2025), 12, Seite 827-831  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:51  |g year:2025  |g number:12  |g pages:827-831 
856 |u https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/f8e3e43e-8b65-49f1-a060-4950fa88fb60  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110029  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/51/12/827  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4811871510 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 194211804X 
LOK |0 005 20251124102758 
LOK |0 008 251124||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw