Identity disclosure in organ donation: Balancing choice, benefits, and risks

BackgroundDisclosure of information that identifies deceased organ donors and/or organ transplant recipients is prohibited in many countries, including Australia. Anecdotal evidence suggests that some donor family members and transplant recipients desire and independently establish contact using str...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Cignarella, Anthony (Author) ; Marshall, Andrea (Author) ; Hewitt, Jayne (Author) ; Opdam, Helen (Author) ; Ranse, Kristen (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2025
In: Nursing ethics
Year: 2025, Volume: 32, Issue: 7, Pages: 2417-2430
Further subjects:B donor family
B Choice
B transplant recipient
B Risk
B Organ Donation
B Contact
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1939716632
003 DE-627
005 20251030055507.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251030s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/09697330251343421  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1939716632 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1939716632 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Cignarella, Anthony  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0001-6637-8901  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Identity disclosure in organ donation: Balancing choice, benefits, and risks 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a BackgroundDisclosure of information that identifies deceased organ donors and/or organ transplant recipients is prohibited in many countries, including Australia. Anecdotal evidence suggests that some donor family members and transplant recipients desire and independently establish contact using strategies such as social media.ObjectiveTo describe and synthesise the views of Australian donor family members, transplant recipients, and healthcare professionals regarding the disclosure of identifying information between donor family members and transplant recipients.Research designAn exploratory descriptive qualitative study design was used.Participants and research contextSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 donor family members, 25 transplant recipients, and 16 healthcare professionals. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were extracted and synthesised using thematic analysis.Ethical considerationsThis study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Griffith University, Queensland. Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.FindingsThree themes were revealed: (i) a desire for choice, (ii) perceptions of benefits, and (iii) perceptions of risks and risk mitigation. Some donor family members and transplant recipients would like the choice to pursue identifiable contact, and for this to be facilitated by donation agencies and transplant units. Many healthcare professionals also support the notion of choice.ConclusionCurrent Australian laws prohibit the disclosure of information identifying deceased organ donors and transplant recipients to each other. Any desire to amend existing laws would necessitate a thorough consultation process and the establishment of suitable systems and processes to support identity disclosure. Further research is needed to ascertain options for identifiable contact and to identify strategies to maximise benefit and minimise harm for donor family members and recipients. 
650 4 |a transplant recipient 
650 4 |a Risk 
650 4 |a Organ Donation 
650 4 |a donor family 
650 4 |a Contact 
650 4 |a Choice 
700 1 |a Marshall, Andrea  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0001-7692-403X  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hewitt, Jayne  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0002-6888-2666  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Opdam, Helen  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ranse, Kristen  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0003-0196-9529  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Nursing ethics  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1994  |g 32(2025), 7, Seite 2417-2430  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)324869460  |w (DE-600)2031461-9  |w (DE-576)273866605  |x 1477-0989  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:32  |g year:2025  |g number:7  |g pages:2417-2430 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251343421  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4794523130 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1939716632 
LOK |0 005 20251030055507 
LOK |0 008 251030||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-10-29#B8548980782E9ABC8CB7E601810B8D922BFB36FE 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw