An Atonement Problem for Contradictory Christology

Recently, Jc Beall has advanced a model of the incarnation according to which one can reconcile the apparently incompatible attributes attributed to Christ by taking them as true contradictions. In this paper, I argue that Contradictory Christology proves incompatible with a central class of atoneme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Smith, Drew (Verfasst von)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: 2025
In: TheoLogica
Jahr: 2025, Band: 9, Heft: 1, Seiten: 157-173
weitere Schlagwörter:B Salvation
B Atonement
B Contradictory Christology
B FDE
B Classical Logic
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1938344057
003 DE-627
005 20251014102207.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251014s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.14428/thl.v9i1.78863  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1938344057 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1938344057 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Smith, Drew  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 3 |a An Atonement Problem for Contradictory Christology 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Recently, Jc Beall has advanced a model of the incarnation according to which one can reconcile the apparently incompatible attributes attributed to Christ by taking them as true contradictions. In this paper, I argue that Contradictory Christology proves incompatible with a central class of atonement theories. I begin by expositing Beall’s model in contrast to two models operating upon the assumption of classical logic. Next, I demonstrate the incompatibility between Beall's theory and theories of the atonement on which Christ's suffering was a necessary condition of salvation. Finally, provide a brief survey of three prominent atonement theories, highlighting their endorsement of this principle. 
601 |a Problem 
601 |a Christologie 
650 4 |a Atonement 
650 4 |a Classical Logic 
650 4 |a Contradictory Christology 
650 4 |a FDE 
650 4 |a Salvation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t TheoLogica  |d Louvain-la-Neuve : Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain, 2017  |g 9(2025), 1, Seite 157-173  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1662480458  |w (DE-600)2967603-4  |x 2593-0265  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:9  |g year:2025  |g number:1  |g pages:157-173 
856 |u https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/theologica/article/download/78863/73763  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.14428/thl.v9i1.78863  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/theologica/article/view/78863  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4786862401 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1938344057 
LOK |0 005 20251014102207 
LOK |0 008 251014||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw