Creation as Relation: An Existential Consideration

Aquinas argues that the relation established by the act of creation is mixed, with the creature enjoying a real relation (relatio realis)—possessing both the relational mode of being and its relational notion (esse et ratio relationis)—while the Creator accommodates only a corresponding relation of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McNamara, Robert (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2025
In: The Thomist
Year: 2025, Volume: 89, Issue: 4, Pages: 625-661
Further subjects:B Thomism
B Creation
B Dependence
B Relationstechnik
B Poison
B Existential
B Person
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1938148398
003 DE-627
005 20251217134813.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251010s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1353/tho.2025.a971421  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1938148398 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1938148398 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a McNamara, Robert  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Creation as Relation: An Existential Consideration 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Aquinas argues that the relation established by the act of creation is mixed, with the creature enjoying a real relation (relatio realis)—possessing both the relational mode of being and its relational notion (esse et ratio relationis)—while the Creator accommodates only a corresponding relation of reason (relatio rationis)—possessing the relational notion (ratio relationis) without any relational mode of being (esse relationis). This position is frequently the source of misunderstanding, for theologians, both natural and revealed, and for ordinary persons of biblical faith. By clarifying Aquinas’s position, I show how such disquiet flows from a twofold interconnected failure: lack of appreciation for Aquinas’s conception of relation as a categorial mode of being; and inadequate consideration of the compelling theological reasons he has for holding such an ostensibly disconcerting position. By way of response, I argue that the position of Aquinas possesses a balanced tension that is necessary to secure the crucial duality of divine transcendence and divine immanence, while concomitantly safeguarding the corresponding radicality of creaturely dependence upon the Creator. Finally, I conclude by noting several existential implications of Aquinas’s position, all of which are centered around the unmediated presence of the Creator to the creature, and the correlative unmediated dependence of the creature upon the Creator. 
650 4 |a Gift 
650 4 |a Dependence 
650 4 |a Existential 
650 4 |a Thomism 
650 4 |a Person 
650 4 |a Relation 
650 4 |a Creation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Thomist  |d Washington, DC : Thomist Press, 1939  |g 89(2025), 4, Seite 625-661  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)324743165  |w (DE-600)2030270-8  |w (DE-576)093981724  |x 2473-3725  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:89  |g year:2025  |g number:4  |g pages:625-661 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.2025.a971421  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/16/article/971421  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4784280685 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1938148398 
LOK |0 005 20251010055531 
LOK |0 008 251010||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-10-09#C4CD6C859BAFEC2CCE3138B7DF5600D713FC86F5 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 10-10-25  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Person,Poison,Poisons,Relationstechnik,Relation,Relation (law),Relation 
STB 0 0 |a Personne,Poison,Poisons,Relation,Relation 
STC 0 0 |a Persona,Relación,Relación,Veneno,Venenos 
STD 0 0 |a Persona,Relazione,Relazione,Veleno,Veleno,Composti chimici tossici 
STE 0 0 |a 个人,个体,关系,关系,联系 
STF 0 0 |a 個人,個體,毒物,關係,關係,聯係 
STG 0 0 |a Pessoas,Relação,Relação,Veneno,Veneno 
STH 0 0 |a Соотношение (право),Соотношение,Человек,Лицо,Яд (мотив),Яд 
STI 0 0 |a Άτομο,Δηλητήριο (μοτίβο),Δηλητήριο,Σχέση <δίκαιο>,Σχέση <φιλοσοφία>,Συσχέτιση (φιλοσοφία),Συσχέτιση (δίκαιο) 
SYE 0 0 |a Giftstoffe,Giftstoff,Toxikon,Gifte , Strassburger Zeitung,Strassburger Relation , Relationstechnik,Relationsmethode,Relationstabelle,Aktenspiegel,Scott schedule