Rhetorical criticism and the affective dimension of the biblical text

In the years since James Muilenburg challenged biblical scholars to move beyond form criticism, rhetorical criticism has become an accepted method within Old Testament studies. Biblical scholars, however, have been hesitant to examine the affective argument of biblical rhetoric, what Aristotle calle...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martin, Lee Roy (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2014
In: Journal for semitics
Year: 2014, Volume: 23, Issue: 2, Pages: 339-353
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1937987949
003 DE-627
005 20251008122415.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251008s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10520/EJC166276  |2 hdl 
035 |a (DE-627)1937987949 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1937987949 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1051958032  |0 (DE-627)787203351  |0 (DE-576)407614818  |4 aut  |a Martin, Lee Roy 
109 |a Martin, Lee Roy 
245 1 0 |a Rhetorical criticism and the affective dimension of the biblical text 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In the years since James Muilenburg challenged biblical scholars to move beyond form criticism, rhetorical criticism has become an accepted method within Old Testament studies. Biblical scholars, however, have been hesitant to examine the affective argument of biblical rhetoric, what Aristotle called pathos. This article suggests that the biblical documents advocate for certain agendas, and they use both logical and affective proofs to form their arguments. Therefore, what is offered here is a critical approach to examining the affective content of the biblical text, not as a new method, but as one part of the larger hermeneutical strategy. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal for semitics  |d Pretoria : Unisa Press, 1990  |g 23(2014), 2, Seite 339-353  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)770032664  |w (DE-600)2737231-5  |w (DE-576)394410483  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:23  |g year:2014  |g number:2  |g pages:339-353 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)165061747X  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC166276  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4782644221 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1937987949 
LOK |0 005 20251008120908 
LOK |0 008 251008||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a ixrk 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB