The significance of scribal practices in 11QpaleoLev : Adrianus van Selms Memorial Lecture

This paper was delivered as the Van Selms Memorial Lecture at the 2006 congress of the South African Society of Near Eastern Studies, at the University of Pretoria. The audience was composed of specialists and the general public. A visual display on screen of details of the scroll facilitated discus...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lübbe, J. C. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2010
In: Journal for semitics
Year: 2010, Volume: 19, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-18
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 193776396X
003 DE-627
005 20251006125241.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251006s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10520/EJC101150  |2 hdl 
035 |a (DE-627)193776396X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP193776396X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lübbe, J. C.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The significance of scribal practices in 11QpaleoLev : Adrianus van Selms Memorial Lecture 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper was delivered as the Van Selms Memorial Lecture at the 2006 congress of the South African Society of Near Eastern Studies, at the University of Pretoria. The audience was composed of specialists and the general public. A visual display on screen of details of the scroll facilitated discussion, especially for non-specialists. In the light of the composition of the audience, the paper is divided into two parts, the latter more technical than the former. Several aspects of the work of textual critics are presented in order to demonstrate to non-specialists the level of technical expertise required before emending the received text. The explanation is intended to counter preachers and teachers who appear to alter the text at will, in order to achieve a preconceived goal. It is, however, not only the layman who is obliged to hesitate before the text, but the expert must also re-evaluate his own conclusions in the light of additional evidence. The latter aspect is argued in response to Tov's most recent assertion that a certain group of texts, characterised by scribal procedures and traces of a Hebrew dialect, were copied at Qumran. 
601 |a Selms, Adrianus van 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal for semitics  |d Pretoria : Unisa Press, 1990  |g 19(2010), 1, Seite 1-18  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)770032664  |w (DE-600)2737231-5  |w (DE-576)394410483  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:19  |g year:2010  |g number:1  |g pages:1-18 
856 4 0 |u https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC101150  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4781243924 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 193776396X 
LOK |0 005 20251006123341 
LOK |0 008 251006||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a ixrk 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB