From dividual and individual selves to porous subjects

The distinction between understanding persons as dividuals versus individuals began to develop in the latter half of the twentieth century. Originating in Louis Dumont’s comparative work into the differences between Western and Indian subjects in the 1950s, it perhaps reached its zenith in the 1980s...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:  
Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Smith, Karl (Συγγραφέας)
Τύπος μέσου: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο
Γλώσσα:Αγγλικά
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Έκδοση: 2012
Στο/Στη: The Australian journal of anthropology
Έτος: 2012, Τόμος: 23, Τεύχος: 1, Σελίδες: 50-64
Διαθέσιμο Online: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1937587770
003 DE-627
005 20251219054946.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251002s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1757-6547.2012.00167.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1937587770 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1937587770 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Smith, Karl  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a From dividual and individual selves to porous subjects 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The distinction between understanding persons as dividuals versus individuals began to develop in the latter half of the twentieth century. Originating in Louis Dumont’s comparative work into the differences between Western and Indian subjects in the 1950s, it perhaps reached its zenith in the 1980s when Marilyn Strathern used it to differentiate between Melanesian and Western concepts of the person. By the end of the century, critique and reconceptualisation of the individual:dividual distinction was so well established in the anthropological literature that its explanatory capacity was largely negated. The aim of this paper is to attempt to clarify the different modes of personhood that the dividual:individual distinction sought to elucidate by introducing a useful distinction between the self and the human subject and further developing Charles Taylor’s distinction between porous and buffered selves. 
601 |a Individuation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Australian journal of anthropology  |d Malden, MA : Wiley-Blackwell, 1990  |g 23(2012), 1, Seite 50-64  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341898244  |w (DE-600)2069565-2  |w (DE-576)254422004  |x 1757-6547  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:23  |g year:2012  |g number:1  |g pages:50-64 
856 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1757-6547.2012.00167.x  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free article)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-6547.2012.00167.x  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1757-6547.2012.00167.x  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4779714001 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1937587770 
LOK |0 005 20251002055758 
LOK |0 008 251002||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-08-18#61864AE21382D09D5E6C95711A3DCF331DFF44C9 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixrk  |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 02-10-25  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw