Dcdd Donors Are Not Dead

According to international scientific medical consensus, death is a biological, unidirectional, ontological state of an organism, the event that separates the process of dying from the process of disintegration. Death is not merely a social contrivance or a normative concept; it is a scientific real...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Joffe, Ari (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 2018
In: The Hastings Center report
Anno: 2018, Volume: 48, Pagine: 29-32
Accesso online: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1937581217
003 DE-627
005 20251002055746.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251002s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1002/hast.949  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1937581217 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1937581217 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Joffe, Ari  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Dcdd Donors Are Not Dead 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a According to international scientific medical consensus, death is a biological, unidirectional, ontological state of an organism, the event that separates the process of dying from the process of disintegration. Death is not merely a social contrivance or a normative concept; it is a scientific reality. Using this paradigm, the international consensus is that, regardless of context, death is operationally defined as “the permanent loss of the capacity for consciousness and all brainstem function. This may result from permanent cessation of circulation or catastrophic brain injury. In the context of death determination, ‘permanent’ refers to loss of function that cannot resume spontaneously and will not be restored through intervention.” The word “permanent” replaces “irreversible” (used in the United States’ 1980 Uniform Declaration of Death Act) in this new definition, arguably invented to allow donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD) while still complying with the dead donor rule. I will show that this invention fails, for at least four reasons. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Hastings Center  |t The Hastings Center report  |d Malden, Mass. : Wiley, 1971  |g 48(2018), S4, Seite 29-32  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341346551  |w (DE-600)2067369-3  |w (DE-576)258761822  |x 1552-146X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:48  |g year:2018  |g supplement:S4  |g pages:29-32 
856 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/hast.949  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free article)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.949  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hast.949  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4779707447 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1937581217 
LOK |0 005 20251002055746 
LOK |0 008 251002||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-09-27#F1C6EE19C2D275E19B0B7368065BE5A8B82336E9 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixrk  |a ixzs  |a zota  |a tiep 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw