Confronting Biospecimen Exceptionalism in Proposed Revisions to the Common Rule
On September 8, 2015, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a Notice of Proposed Rule Making to revise the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, widely known as the “Common Rule.” The NPRM proposes several changes to the current system, including a dramatic shift in the a...
| VerfasserInnen: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2016
|
| In: |
The Hastings Center report
Jahr: 2016, Band: 46, Heft: 1, Seiten: 4-5 |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1937532577 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20251002055620.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 251002s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/hast.528 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1937532577 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1937532577 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lynch, Holly Fernandez |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Lynch, Holly Fernandez |a Fernandez Lynch, Holly | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Confronting Biospecimen Exceptionalism in Proposed Revisions to the Common Rule |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a On September 8, 2015, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a Notice of Proposed Rule Making to revise the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, widely known as the “Common Rule.” The NPRM proposes several changes to the current system, including a dramatic shift in the approach to secondary research using biospecimens and data. Under the current rules, it is relatively easy to use biospecimens and data for secondary research. This approach systematically facilitates secondary research with biospecimens and data, maximizing the capacity for substantial public benefit. However, it has been criticized as insufficiently protective of the privacy and autonomy interests of biospecimen and data sources. Thus, the NPRM proposes a more restrictive regime, although more so for biospecimens than data. Both the status quo and the NPRM's proposal are critically flawed. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Bierer, Barbara E. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cohen, I. Glenn |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a Hastings Center |t The Hastings Center report |d Malden, Mass. : Wiley, 1971 |g 46(2016), 1, Seite 4-5 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341346551 |w (DE-600)2067369-3 |w (DE-576)258761822 |x 1552-146X |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:46 |g year:2016 |g number:1 |g pages:4-5 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.528 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hast.528 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4779658756 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1937532577 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20251002055620 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 251002||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-09-26#01EA2EF7C1B4B78B24521046B40111B4525E7D52 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixrk |a ixzs |a zota |a tiep | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
