Regulating Research with Biospecimens under the Revised Common Rule

Since 2011, the research community had waited with bated breath as regulators contemplated for the first time bringing secondary research with nonidentifiable biospecimens under the Common Rule and dramatically tightening the criteria for waiving consent to biospecimen research. After considerable p...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Lynch, Holly Fernandez (Author) ; Meyer, Michelle N. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2017
In: The Hastings Center report
Year: 2017, Volume: 47, Issue: 3, Pages: 3-4
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1937531341
003 DE-627
005 20251002055617.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251002s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1002/hast.697  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1937531341 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1937531341 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lynch, Holly Fernandez  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Lynch, Holly Fernandez  |a Fernandez Lynch, Holly 
245 1 0 |a Regulating Research with Biospecimens under the Revised Common Rule 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Since 2011, the research community had waited with bated breath as regulators contemplated for the first time bringing secondary research with nonidentifiable biospecimens under the Common Rule and dramatically tightening the criteria for waiving consent to biospecimen research. After considerable pushback from both researchers and patients and amid rumors of intractable disagreement among Common Rule agencies, the Final Rule published on the last day of President Obama's administration left out these troubling changes, and there was a collective sigh of relief. Relief is appropriate, but celebration premature: researchers have little reason to avail themselves of the new broad consent option offered in the Final Rule, and the question of whether biospecimens ought to be treated as inherently identifiable has merely been postponed. 
700 1 |a Meyer, Michelle N.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Hastings Center  |t The Hastings Center report  |d Malden, Mass. : Wiley, 1971  |g 47(2017), 3, Seite 3-4  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341346551  |w (DE-600)2067369-3  |w (DE-576)258761822  |x 1552-146X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:47  |g year:2017  |g number:3  |g pages:3-4 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.697  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hast.697  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4779657520 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1937531341 
LOK |0 005 20251002055617 
LOK |0 008 251002||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-09-26#353A34EA199EA23BDA4301FDEE4BA2FB6E58CE86 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixrk  |a ixzs  |a zota  |a tiep 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw