Decision-Making for an Incapacitated Pregnant Patient
Decisions about continuing or terminating a pregnancy touch on profound, individualized questions about bodily integrity, reproductive autonomy, deeply held values regarding one's capacity for parenthood, and, in the case of a high-risk pregnancy, the risks one is willing to take to have a baby...
| Authors: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2017
|
| In: |
The Hastings Center report
Year: 2017, Volume: 47, Issue: 4, Pages: 12-15 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1937531139 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20251002055617.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 251002s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/hast.734 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1937531139 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1937531139 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mabel, Hilary |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Decision-Making for an Incapacitated Pregnant Patient |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Decisions about continuing or terminating a pregnancy touch on profound, individualized questions about bodily integrity, reproductive autonomy, deeply held values regarding one's capacity for parenthood, and, in the case of a high-risk pregnancy, the risks one is willing to take to have a baby. So far as possible, reproductive decisions are made between a patient, in some cases her partner, and her medical provider. However, this standard framework cannot be applied if the patient lacks decision-making capacity. In this essay, we discuss one such case that came before our clinical ethics team. We describe the challenges of respecting a patient's reproductive preferences when the patient cannot share what those preferences are, and we argue that decisions regarding reproductive health care should not be treated with exceptionalism. Rather, they should proceed under the normal processes of surrogate decision-making, including the application of substituted judgment. This approach enables us to take the patient's values into account when considering the questions implicated in reproductive health care, just as we do for other kinds of health care decisions in which a patient's deeply held values are salient. | ||
| 601 | |a Patient | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Rose, Susannah L. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kodish, Eric |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a Hastings Center |t The Hastings Center report |d Malden, Mass. : Wiley, 1971 |g 47(2017), 4, Seite 12-15 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341346551 |w (DE-600)2067369-3 |w (DE-576)258761822 |x 1552-146X |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:47 |g year:2017 |g number:4 |g pages:12-15 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.734 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hast.734 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4779657318 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1937531139 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20251002055617 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 251002||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-09-26#86564FBD6B00941C678E336041281ADAE07EF5F1 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixrk |a ixzs |a zota |a tiep | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
