Dementia and the Death Penalty

During its 2018–2019 term, the United States Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of executing a prisoner with dementia. In Madison v. Alabama, the Court ruled that, in certain circumstances, executing a prisoner with dementia violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punish...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dresser, Rebecca (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2019
In: The Hastings Center report
Year: 2019, Volume: 49, Issue: 6, Pages: 6-7
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1937529002
003 DE-627
005 20251002055613.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251002s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1002/hast.1061  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1937529002 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1937529002 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Dresser, Rebecca  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Dresser, Rebecca  |a Dresser, Rebecca Susan 
245 1 0 |a Dementia and the Death Penalty 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a During its 2018–2019 term, the United States Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of executing a prisoner with dementia. In Madison v. Alabama, the Court ruled that, in certain circumstances, executing a prisoner with dementia violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. Vernon Madison was sentenced to death for killing a police officer in 1985. After many years on Alabama’s death row, he had a series of strokes and was diagnosed with vascular dementia. In 2016, Madison’s lawyers unsuccessfully sought a stay of execution, arguing that, in light of his cognitive impairments, imposing the death penalty would violate the Constitution. After Alabama set a 2018 execution date, lawyers returned to the state court, arguing that the finding of competence should be reversed because Madison’s cognitive impairments had worsened. When the trial court refused to grant the stay of execution, Madison’s lawyers asked the Supreme Court to review the constitutionality of the state court decision. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Hastings Center  |t The Hastings Center report  |d Malden, Mass. : Wiley, 1971  |g 49(2019), 6, Seite 6-7  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341346551  |w (DE-600)2067369-3  |w (DE-576)258761822  |x 1552-146X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:49  |g year:2019  |g number:6  |g pages:6-7 
856 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/hast.1061  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free article)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1061  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hast.1061  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 477965517X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1937529002 
LOK |0 005 20251002055613 
LOK |0 008 251002||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-09-26#1CD0DB07992019D8B41CACFE953DB057ADEEBDA9 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixrk  |a ixzs  |a zota  |a tiep 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw