Restricting Reasons: A New Battleground in Abortion Regulation

The latest trend in abortion restrictions in the United States targets a woman's reasons for terminating a pregnancy. Fourteen states have attempted to enact laws prohibiting abortion on the basis of fetal sex, race, and/or genetic anomaly. These laws are different from regulations tied to a go...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Will, Jonathan F. (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Опубликовано: 2020
В: The Hastings Center report
Год: 2020, Том: 50, Выпуск: 5, Страницы: 7-8
Другие ключевые слова:B Discrimination
B medical decision-making
B Reproductive Rights
B Abortion
Online-ссылка: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1937528030
003 DE-627
005 20251002055611.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251002s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1002/hast.1178  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1937528030 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1937528030 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Will, Jonathan F.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Will, Jonathan F. 
245 1 0 |a Restricting Reasons: A New Battleground in Abortion Regulation 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The latest trend in abortion restrictions in the United States targets a woman's reasons for terminating a pregnancy. Fourteen states have attempted to enact laws prohibiting abortion on the basis of fetal sex, race, and/or genetic anomaly. These laws are different from regulations tied to a government interest in protecting women's health. Laws that restrict reasons implicate a different set of government interests to be weighed against a woman's constitutional right first recognized in Roe v. Wade. These laws also seek to reframe the nature of the right asserted by the woman. To date, the Supreme Court has declined to address the constitutionality of laws that restrict reasons, and the Court's most recent abortion decisions provide little guidance. It is possible that a conservative majority of the Supreme Court would uphold a law that prohibits reasons for having an abortion that appear discriminatory. But such laws would be difficult to enforce and therefore may be relegated to policy statements rejecting discriminatory norms as opposed to being effective means of restricting access to abortion. 
650 4 |a medical decision-making 
650 4 |a Discrimination 
650 4 |a Abortion 
650 4 |a Reproductive Rights 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Hastings Center  |t The Hastings Center report  |d Malden, Mass. : Wiley, 1971  |g 50(2020), 5, Seite 7-8  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341346551  |w (DE-600)2067369-3  |w (DE-576)258761822  |x 1552-146X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:50  |g year:2020  |g number:5  |g pages:7-8 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1178  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hast.1178  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4779654203 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1937528030 
LOK |0 005 20251002055611 
LOK |0 008 251002||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-09-26#F0DFD7E1DDE1F0FF4A23C03697323D50E58118A2 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixrk  |a ixzs  |a zota  |a tiep 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw