Virtuous Arguing With Conviction and Humility

Can one enter into an argument with one’s intellectual equals in good faith if one regards the matter in hand as already settled? Adopting such an attitude looks very much like taking a dogmatic stance, in that one is closing one’s mind to counterarguments in advance. Dogmatism is, of course, an int...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Pritchard, Duncan 1974- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2025
Dans: Ethical theory and moral practice
Année: 2025, Volume: 28, Numéro: 3, Pages: 433-446
Classifications IxTheo:NCD Éthique et politique
VB Herméneutique; philosophie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Intellectual Virtue
B Epistemology
B Open-Mindedness
B Intellectual Humility
B Disagreement
B Arguing
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1937150755
003 DE-627
005 20260127155433.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250929s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-022-10328-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1937150755 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1937150755 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)14329654X  |0 (DE-627)64472272X  |0 (DE-576)336121482  |4 aut  |a Pritchard, Duncan  |d 1974- 
109 |a Pritchard, Duncan 1974- 
245 1 0 |a Virtuous Arguing With Conviction and Humility 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Can one enter into an argument with one’s intellectual equals in good faith if one regards the matter in hand as already settled? Adopting such an attitude looks very much like taking a dogmatic stance, in that one is closing one’s mind to counterarguments in advance. Dogmatism is, of course, an intellectual vice. Moreover, such dogmatism seems morally problematic, in that one is failing to treat one’s adversary with due respect. While there is clearly something correct about this line of thinking—dogmatism, like all intellectual vice, is obviously to be avoided—it is also maintained that, properly understood, there need be nothing intellectually viceful about engaging in an argument where one regards the subject matter as settled. Related to this point, it is contended that someone who possesses the intellectual virtue of intellectual humility may well engage in arguments in just this fashion. The upshot is that one can consistently and properly argue with both conviction and intellectual humility. 
650 4 |a Arguing 
650 4 |a Disagreement 
650 4 |a Epistemology 
650 4 |a Intellectual Humility 
650 4 |a Intellectual Virtue 
650 4 |a Open-Mindedness 
652 |a NCD:VB 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 28(2025), 3, Seite 433-446  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:28  |g year:2025  |g number:3  |g pages:433-446 
856 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-022-10328-2.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-022-10328-2  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4777214567 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1937150755 
LOK |0 005 20260127155433 
LOK |0 008 250929||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205381X  |a VB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052856  |a NCD 
LOK |0 939   |a 29-09-25  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL