Asking before Arguing? Consent in Argumentation
Arguments involve, at minimum, attempts at presenting something that an audience will take to be a reason. Reasons, once understood, affect an addressee’s beliefs in ways that are in some significant sense outside of their direct voluntary control. Since such changes may impact the well-being, life...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2025
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2025, Volume: 28, Issue: 3, Pages: 447-460 |
| IxTheo Classification: | NCB Personal ethics VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Consent
B Argumantation B Autonomy B Doxastic Voluntarism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1937150720 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20260127155705.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250929s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-023-10388-y |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1937150720 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1937150720 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Stevens, Katharina |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Asking before Arguing? Consent in Argumentation |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2025 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Arguments involve, at minimum, attempts at presenting something that an audience will take to be a reason. Reasons, once understood, affect an addressee’s beliefs in ways that are in some significant sense outside of their direct voluntary control. Since such changes may impact the well-being, life projects, or sense of self of the addressee, they risk infringing upon their autonomy. We call this the "autonomy worry" of argumentation. In light of this worry, this paper asks whether one ought to seek an addressee’s consent before arguing with them. We first consider the view that arguing of any sort and on any topic requires consent. However, such a view is extreme, and we reject the general requirement of consent because argument contains its own internal permission structure. We find, however, that this permission structure is not always operative, and that consent may nonetheless be morally required in certain kinds of cases. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Argumentation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Autonomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Consent | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Doxastic Voluntarism | |
| 652 | |a NCB:VB | ||
| 700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1258992442 |0 (DE-627)1805733338 |4 aut |a Casey, John | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 28(2025), 3, Seite 447-460 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2025 |g number:3 |g pages:447-460 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-023-10388-y |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4777214532 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1937150720 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20260127155705 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250929||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205381X |a VB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052813 |a NCB | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 29-09-25 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Argumantation,Reasoning |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Argumentation,Raisonnement |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Argumentación |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Argomentazione |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 论据 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 論據 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Argumentação |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Аргументация |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Επιχειρηματολογία |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Argumentieren |
