Hoe meer kompleks, hoe meer wetenskap? ’n Interaksie met “The complexity of science” deur X

Does more complexity imply more science?Reflection on the article by X allows for appreciative as well as critical remarks. The main gist of the re(inter)action may be formulated as follows: yes, science is a complex phenomenon and as such may follow the behaviour of complex systems in general. But...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Authors: Plessis, Pieter du (Author) ; Kruger, Jaco (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Língua não determinada
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado em: 1999
Em: Koers
Ano: 1999, Volume: 64, Número: 4, Páginas: 521-529
Acesso em linha: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1936632322
003 DE-627
005 20250924055550.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250924s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||und c
024 7 |a 10.4102/koers.v64i4.516  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1936632322 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1936632322 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Plessis, Pieter du  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Hoe meer kompleks, hoe meer wetenskap? ’n Interaksie met “The complexity of science” deur X 
264 1 |c 1999 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Does more complexity imply more science?Reflection on the article by X allows for appreciative as well as critical remarks. The main gist of the re(inter)action may be formulated as follows: yes, science is a complex phenomenon and as such may follow the behaviour of complex systems in general. But in what way does the complexity of science distinguish it from other equally complex human activities? The underlying problem is one of setting boundaries. We have reservations that the boundaries of science may in one sense be defined too narrowly, and in another sense again be made too encompassing. By making complexity the identifying characteristic of science, we lose sight of other important aspects contributing to the identity of science such as the presence of appropriate method, and a critical/responsible thought altitude. In that sense it is too narrow a definition of science. On the other hand science as (a selforganising rational) complex system is m danger of being regarded as autonomous, thereby stretching its boundaries too far. With regard to that we emphasize that science is continually m interaction with intra- and extra-scientific "systems”. Furthermore, science does not exist solely for its own sake. Guided by the principles of caritas and sapientia, it ought to further the establishment of shalom in society. 
700 1 |a Kruger, Jaco  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Koers  |d Centurion : South African Publ., 1934  |g 64(1999), 4, Seite 521-529  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)387481478  |w (DE-600)2145751-7  |w (DE-576)380443740  |x 2304-8557  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:64  |g year:1999  |g number:4  |g pages:521-529 
856 |u https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/download/516/641  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v64i4.516  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/516  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4775430661 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1936632322 
LOK |0 005 20250924055550 
LOK |0 008 250924||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-08-27#68FEBE2CABC3412958674EC108E7054A661D1096 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixrk  |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw