Tongues as Glossolalic Prayer – a Pentecostal Invention?: A Reply to Blosser and Sullivan
In Speaking in Tongues: A Critical Historical Examination, Blosser and Sullivan argue that the glossolalic interpretation of tongues was an invention of the early Pentecostals aided by rationalistic higher critics in ignorance of the ecclesial tradition of tongues as xenolalia. The author here argue...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2025
|
| In: |
Journal of pentecostal theology
Year: 2025, Volume: 34, Issue: 2, Pages: 269-289 |
| Further subjects: | B
Philip E. Blosser
B xenolalia B Glossolalia B Charles A. Sullivan B Church History |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1935518194 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250910055505.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250910s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/17455251-bja10073 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1935518194 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1935518194 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gresham, John |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Gresham, John |a Gresham, John D. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Tongues as Glossolalic Prayer – a Pentecostal Invention?: A Reply to Blosser and Sullivan |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2025 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In Speaking in Tongues: A Critical Historical Examination, Blosser and Sullivan argue that the glossolalic interpretation of tongues was an invention of the early Pentecostals aided by rationalistic higher critics in ignorance of the ecclesial tradition of tongues as xenolalia. The author here argues against Blosser and Sullivan that the early Pentecostal account of tongues was a rediscovery rather than an invention; the higher critical account of tongues as glossolalia was not due to rationalistic bias but a fresh reading of Scripture in historical context; and the patristic tradition shows evidence of glossolalic tongues in the early centuries with the xenolalic interpretation only emerging after a decline in charismatic gifts. | ||
| 601 | |a Glossolalie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Charles A. Sullivan | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philip E. Blosser | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Church History | |
| 650 | 4 | |a xenolalia | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Glossolalia | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of pentecostal theology |d Leiden : Brill, 1992 |g 34(2025), 2, Seite 269-289 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341897620 |w (DE-600)2069503-2 |w (DE-576)263021262 |x 1745-5251 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:34 |g year:2025 |g number:2 |g pages:269-289 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455251-bja10073 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/pent/34/2/article-p269_008.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4770554737 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1935518194 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250910055505 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250910||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-09-09#25C34ED607411341D97A365826A1B21FA3073CE4 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
