St. Thomas, Divine Freedom, and Compatibilism: A Reply to Pedersen and Lilley
In their recent article, Daniel J. Pedersen and Christopher Lilley construct a two-pronged response to the modal collapse argument against divine simplicity. The first prong relies heavily on distinctions developed by Thomas Aquinas. This essay contests their interpretation of Aquinas by demonstrati...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2025
|
| Dans: |
Journal of reformed theology
Année: 2025, Volume: 19, Numéro: 3, Pages: 232-255 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Divine Freedom
B modal collapse B Thomas Aquinas B Simplicity |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1935324349 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20251217130742.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250905s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/15697312-bja10065 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1935324349 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1935324349 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chopp, Joel Thomas |e VerfasserIn |0 (orcid)0009-0009-5761-1682 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a St. Thomas, Divine Freedom, and Compatibilism: A Reply to Pedersen and Lilley |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2025 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In their recent article, Daniel J. Pedersen and Christopher Lilley construct a two-pronged response to the modal collapse argument against divine simplicity. The first prong relies heavily on distinctions developed by Thomas Aquinas. This essay contests their interpretation of Aquinas by demonstrating that they misconstrue fundamental elements of his modal semantics and doctrine of divine freedom. Subsequently, for theologians who adopt a Thomistic account of these doctrines, it cannot provide a means for avoiding the modal collapse argument. I conclude with suggestions for fruitful avenues to pursue in the ongoing debate over the doctrines of divine simplicity and freedom. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a modal collapse | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Simplicity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Divine Freedom | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Thomas Aquinas | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of reformed theology |d Leiden : Brill, 2007 |g 19(2025), 3, Seite 232-255 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)529765632 |w (DE-600)2316050-0 |w (DE-576)306834308 |x 1569-7312 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2025 |g number:3 |g pages:232-255 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/15697312-bja10065 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jrt/19/3/article-p232_2.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4768826261 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1935324349 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250905055508 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250905||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-09-04#530E6E553D31B97C626A4B1A5833F3DB45F7821F | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 05-09-25 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
