The two conversation hypothesis: how to better discuss the future for religious education in Australian Catholic schools
In simple, general terms the two conversation hypothesis is premised on different perceptions of the same educational reality. The first conversation is more of an official position buttressed by documents and high expectations of educational bureaucracies and ecclesial authorities. The second conve...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| En: |
Journal of Religious Education
Año: 2025, Volumen: 73, Número: 2, Páginas: 301-306 |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Dialogical approaches
B Faith based religious education B Subsidiarity |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Sumario: | In simple, general terms the two conversation hypothesis is premised on different perceptions of the same educational reality. The first conversation is more of an official position buttressed by documents and high expectations of educational bureaucracies and ecclesial authorities. The second conversation is more grounded in the lived experience of educators working directly in schools with teachers and students. The two conversations often occur in isolation, thereby, curtailing a more fruitful, consequential dialogue directed toward improving the quality of Religious Education (RE) and other related issues in Australian Catholic schools. To illustrate the two conversation hypothesis, two narratives will be offered as a way of presenting rich conceptual themes in a more engaging way. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2199-4625 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Journal of Religious Education
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s40839-025-00264-5 |
